Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6B689380000FE; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:51:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UAm5G-0002Gi-8H for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:50:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UAm5F-0002GZ-Rn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:50:29 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UAm5E-0007DD-3X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:50:28 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBALZULlECZMCt/2dsb2JhbAANOMImgRKDEgEBAQEDOFELCQgEAQEBCRYPCQMCAQIBPQgTBgIBAbY4k12PGxaDKgOWQZNy X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,750,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="420557895" Received: from host-2-100-192-173.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.192.173]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2013 18:50:07 +0000 Message-ID: <512E555B.7040806@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:50:03 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <006a01cdf44b$0ce1c6a0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <50F7AF98.4020405@xs4all.nl> <94CD90CC55DE4F788B16258410A05769@F6CNIHP> <50F81502.9010203@xs4all.nl> <93BA207B736548268552D03FE9C71217@F6CNIHP> <50F82B9F.9000208@xs4all.nl> <0AB78470CBCA43D58178716E5A11059F@F6CNIHP> <50F844B4.3030305@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130227-0, 27/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi G On 27/02/2013 17:08, Graham wrote: > 2013-02-27 03:40 WE2XGR/6 0.475781 -7 0 > FN12lq 20 G8HUH IO81mg 5457 53 > > -7 dB , now that takes some beating ! ok for PSK31 as well ! > > Looks like wspr-2 Ed ? Yey. That is the one that didn't get away. Very nice. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 3b8620872b19e25fb6f4dfaf1256edc3 Subject: Re: LF: WE2XGR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cd512e55c87718 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi G On 27/02/2013 17:08, Graham wrote: > 2013-02-27 03:40 WE2XGR/6 0.475781 -7 0 > FN12lq 20 G8HUH IO81mg 5457 53 > > -7 dB , now that takes some beating ! ok for PSK31 as well ! > > Looks like wspr-2 Ed ? Yey. That is the one that didn't get away. Very nice. Best DX was at the beginning of the month. 2013-02-06 03:10 WE2XGR/6 0.475789 -24 0 FN12lq +43 19.953 DL-SWL JO52hp 6243 3879 When even I did it. 2013-02-06 04:44 WE2XGR/6 0.475789 -26 0 FN12lq +43 19.953 G3ZJO IO92ng 5551 3449 Ed > > G.. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Roelof Bakker" > Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:53 AM > To: > Subject: LF: WE2XGR > >> Hello all, >> >> Overnight, I found 21 decodes from WE2XGR/6 , ranging from S/N -30 to >> -22. >> The distance is 5675 km. >> >> 0454 -22 -2.0 0.475782 0 WE2XGR/6 43 >> >> Best regards, >> Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt >> > >