Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8891B380000F3; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:04:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U9e3X-0001TM-Nx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:04:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U9e3X-0001TD-6Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:04:03 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U9e3V-0000m4-Du for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:04:02 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r1OG3d8b003630 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:03:40 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r1OG3dcG023415; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:03:39 +0100 Message-ID: <512A39D6.3050700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:03:34 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: Vasily Savchenko References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Martin, LF, Thank you for the report and the image. The image is most interesting. I didn't expect that my signal is visible so well over so many sequences. But there was only one decode at 5:30 UTC. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 046f068074e745d5c60ca47deee9b503 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40ca512a3a231252 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Martin, LF, Thank you for the report and the image. The image is most interesting. I didn't expect that my signal is visible so well over so many sequences. But there was only one decode at 5:30 UTC. Here is a link to an image showing my results of last night, https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/WSPR_LF_24022013.png Thanks to the monitoring stations! The LF DX season is not over yet! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 24.02.2013 15:40, schrieb YV7MAE Maritn A. Echazarreta D.: > > Hi for All: > > WSPR 15 report in FK81BD > > 0345 -36 2.8 0.137616 0 WE2XEB FN12 30 > > 0415 -32 4.5 0.137616 0 WE2XEB FN12 30 > > 0445 -33 4.5 0.137616 0 WE2XEB FN12 30 > > 0515 -33 4.9 0.137616 0 WE2XEB FN12 30 > > 0530 -37 2.8 0.137610 0 DK7FC JN49 30 > > 0545 -34 6.3 0.137616 0 WE2XEB FN12 30 > > 73! > > Martin. > > YV7MAE > >