Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AD90A380000A9; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:17:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U9OKh-0006QR-G2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:16:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U9OKh-0006QF-3F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:16:43 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U9OKf-0006My-49 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:16:41 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAAhNKVECZMW3/2dsb2JhbAANOMFRgR+DEgEBAQEDOFELCQgEAQEBCRYPCQMCAQIBPQgTBgIBAYgbrCuSTI8DEgYQgyoDlj2TbA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,724,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="420142684" Received: from host-2-100-197-183.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.197.183]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 23 Feb 2013 23:16:18 +0000 Message-ID: <51294DBE.8080902@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:16:14 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <512777BA.7040400@psk31.plus.com> <5DF82F0D027741818F88CCBF68DA6EBB@AGB> <5127B149.8020809@psk31.plus.com> <4482AC135BC74274965612F498FC34FD@AGB> In-Reply-To: <4482AC135BC74274965612F498FC34FD@AGB> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130223-1, 23/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 23/02/2013 20:32, Graham wrote: > Hat munching time again : ) > WSPR-15 proved to the better WSPR for far distances. > Hello Mal oh sorry its Graham I refer you to a message already handed to the clerk of the court. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: Re: LF: 630m WSPR2 and WSPR15 Distance Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618551294e1261f3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none On 23/02/2013 20:32, Graham wrote: > Hat munching time again : ) > WSPR-15 proved to the better WSPR for far distances. > Hello Mal oh sorry its Graham I refer you to a message already handed to the clerk of the court. Ed > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "g3zjo" > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 5:56 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: 630m WSPR2 and WSPR15 Distance > >> Hi G >> >> On 22/02/2013 15:18, Graham wrote: >>> Correlating random events again Ed .... :) >> Just the fact's ma'am, just give me the facts. >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragnet_%28series%29 1900 and WHAT oh dear. >> >> As for wanting to know how nice soft cheese is, so we set up an >> experiment using dog excreta, little point.:-) >> >> Ed >> > >