Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 88787380001A3; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:42:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U9GHu-0003bI-QK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:41:18 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U9GHu-0003b9-57 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:41:18 +0000 Received: from eterpe-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U9GHp-0004a6-21 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:41:17 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from ignis-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.11]) by eterpe-smout.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTP id <0MIO008IRGS38C70@eterpe-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:40:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([84.48.126.39]) by ignis-smin.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTPA id <0MIO00193GS22Q90@ignis-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:40:51 +0100 (CET) Message-id: <5128D4F2.6000405@broadpark.no> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:40:50 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 To: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, "*rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" References: In-reply-to: X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Markus, sorry for not been able to answer before now. This was great news!! As you know , I am not very found of jose soft, but I will love to play with an open and well documented version. By the way , what about using another name then Opera? The Norwegian Opera Software ASA have registered "Opera" as their trademark and for new users that is used to the "Opera browser" it is a little bit confusing reading about a ham software also called opera, but this is no big deal;) [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.202.8.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 32d4aaaf019758ff5a0d8e92eec683e6 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Subject: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: 0p-32 correlation results online X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41175128d5690742 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Markus, sorry for not been able to answer before now. This was great news!! As you know , I am not very found of jose soft, but I will love to play with an open and well documented version. By the way , what about using another name then Opera? The Norwegian Opera Software ASA have registered "Opera" as their trademark and for new users that is used to the "Opera browser" it is a little bit confusing reading about a ham software also called opera, but this is no big deal;) LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Den 22.02.2013 11:55, skrev Markus: > Steinar, > > yes this is an independent development. It's still very experimental, but I intend to make it public after I have fixed a few more issues. > > The functional difference is that I don't try to decode individual bits, but correlate the message as a whole against precalculated templates from a limited list of callsigns. The benefit is that these detections can be up to 10 to 12 dB more sensitive than the incoherent decoding in the original software. > > Best 73, > Markus > > --- In rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, Steinar Aanesland wrote: >> > Markus, > > What version of this software are you using? > I think I read somewhere that you had made your own > > LA5VNA Steinar > loc:JO59jq > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: > http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/ > > <*> Your email settings: > Individual Email | Traditional > > <*> To change settings online go to: > http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/rsgb_lf_group/join > (Yahoo! ID required) > > <*> To change settings via email: > rsgb_lf_group-digest@yahoogroups.co.uk > rsgb_lf_group-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.co.uk > > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > rsgb_lf_group-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.co.uk > > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: > http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/info/terms.html > > >