MIME-version: 1.0
Message-id: <5122834D.4090106@broadpark.no>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:38:53 +0100
From: Steinar Aanesland <saanes@broadpark.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107
 Thunderbird/17.0.2
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <01c201ce0df6$fca68350$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
 <01d001ce0df7$ec018990$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
 <3751D15C489E45289657A49A3266CF42@AGB>
 <021701ce0e05$1f0acd30$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
In-reply-to: <021701ce0e05$1f0acd30$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org



Hummmm, a lot of crap is slipping through. I have to fine-tuning the
spam filter again :(

LA5VNA Steinar
loc:JO59jq




Den 18.02.2013 19:23, skrev mal hamilton:
> Graham
> It is all inter related. But a few fundamentals are necessary. If it is so bad with for instance a 24 dB disadvantage I would MOVE or pack it in.
> Too many excuses are used, the amateur has enough space for a reasonable antenna but says he is concerned about what the neighbours might think. I have heard this so many times. How much space does a 60 ft vertical take up, less than half a sq metre.
> Surely when a radio amateur is looking for a property he has antennas in mind and looks for the largest real estate he can afford.
> especially if interested in MF or LF. 
> So wspr is totally dependent on the Receive operator ? and a vy quiet location. I thought the whole idea was to overcome this problem
> It is not working, as I said looking at the wspr database, some stns are not even aware that others are active because of lack of signal for what ever reason.
> mal/g3kev
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Graham 
>   To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org 
>   Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 5:01 PM
>   Subject: Re: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS
> 
> 
>   May be , may be not  Mal
> 
>   The system is  reading  the  s/n   at the  Rx   and  not the   field  strength ........  depends on the  local  noise level ,   rst   159  or  599  , carrier  still  S9  ,   1= qrm     5= no  qrm 
> 
>   From: mal hamilton 
>   Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:49 PM
>   To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org 
>   Subject: LF: Re: POOR ANTENNAS
> 
> 
>   Example
>   I am receiving PA3EGO + 2dB another UK stn is showing -22 at a shorter distance. A difference of 24 dB
>   and this station says he is an Expert!! 
> 
> 
>     ----- Original Message ----- 
>     From: mal hamilton 
>     To: rsgb 
>     Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 4:42 PM
>     Subject: LF: POOR ANTENNAS
> 
> 
>     MF
>     One thing the wspr DB shows is how poor some Receivers/Antennas are comparing like with like approximately same distances from Transmitter. 
> 
>     g3kev
> 
>