Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5D96F38000274; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:59:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U7PM6-0002wT-5R for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:57:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U7PM4-0002wK-UF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:57:56 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U7PM2-0008Fj-VA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:57:55 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYBADoWIlFOlm1u/2dsb2JhbAANOIwks32BGoMSAQEBAQNnHgQLCQgEAQEBCRYIBwkDAgECATQJCBMGAgEBtGWSao8sEQEGgzoDliyTXw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,687,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="409335374" Received: from host-78-150-109-110.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([78.150.109.110]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2013 11:57:34 +0000 Message-ID: <5122172B.3080508@psk31.plus.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:57:31 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <00df01ce0dba$13ecb080$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <51220AE0.8060106@psk31.plus.com> <015801ce0dcb$77b16640$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <015801ce0dcb$77b16640$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130218-0, 18/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 18/02/2013 11:31, mal hamilton wrote: > Yes > I did decode you at the same time. I have noticed many times although > I get decodes they do not always appear on the web DB, others have > noticed the same, something to do with the Internet speed at the time. Poor computer equipment ? or lack of understanding that invalid data is detected as invalid.? > If you are throwing doubt about the validy of this decode then treat > the others also as suspect !! You cannot pick and choose. I fully agree, all claims have to meet the criteria, yours does not. > I cannot recall getting false/corrupt decodes, its seems to be all or > nothing. Lack of experience. > It seems odd that it was CX2 a genuine call prefix why was it not CB, > CZ , CY, C31, CL7 etc then it would raise some suspicion. Try to understand the decoding principles, Joe will help you. > You are now guessing that it was WG2XCT is WSPR a > guessamode if you do not like what you see guess what it might be!! There you go twisting what I said to fit your argument, I made no guesses, just an observation based on facts which could help you to get a valid decode, i.e. turn your beam to the West. > I have an open mind about such events but MIRACLES seems to be the > flavour of the month, I am just carried along with the flow !! Oh [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: eb65b97b00a71049be1fa526941c7b31 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR DX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040109030603030404080909" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60ca5122179c51f3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040109030603030404080909 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 18/02/2013 11:31, mal hamilton wrote: > Yes > I did decode you at the same time. I have noticed many times although > I get decodes they do not always appear on the web DB, others have > noticed the same, something to do with the Internet speed at the time. Poor computer equipment ? or lack of understanding that invalid data is detected as invalid.? > If you are throwing doubt about the validy of this decode then treat > the others also as suspect !! You cannot pick and choose. I fully agree, all claims have to meet the criteria, yours does not. > I cannot recall getting false/corrupt decodes, its seems to be all or > nothing. Lack of experience. > It seems odd that it was CX2 a genuine call prefix why was it not CB, > CZ , CY, C31, CL7 etc then it would raise some suspicion. Try to understand the decoding principles, Joe will help you. > You are now guessing that it was WG2XCT ---------- is WSPR a > guessamode if you do not like what you see guess what it might be!! There you go twisting what I said to fit your argument, I made no guesses, just an observation based on facts which could help you to get a valid decode, i.e. turn your beam to the West. > I have an open mind about such events but MIRACLES seems to be the > flavour of the month, I am just carried along with the flow !! Oh Eddie > g3kev > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* g3zjo > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Monday, February 18, 2013 11:05 AM > *Subject:* Re: LF: WSPR DX > > Hi Mal > > On 18/02/2013 09:26, mal hamilton wrote: >> MF >> Some good DX about this past couple of days >> this morning >> 0916 -25 1.4 0.475745 2 CX4DVF 13 > Well at least the system wasn't stupid enough to think it was a > valid decode and add it to the database. > > There really aren't that many false decodes if the RX signal is > free of spurii. May be it was a mix of my enormous signal, you > received me at that time, with a sprog at your end. > > Or maybe you shouldn't be getting sarcastic maybe you should be > getting excited. VK2DAG transmitted at that time. > > More likely though with the coincidence of characters in the Call > and the QRG it could have been WG2XCT also co timed. > >> This must indeed be a MIRACLE mode > Its not doing bad at all lately is it. > > Eddie >> de G3KEV > --------------040109030603030404080909 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 18/02/2013 11:31, mal hamilton wrote:
Yes
I did decode you at the same time. I have noticed many times although I get decodes they do not always appear on the web DB, others have noticed the same, something to do with the Internet speed at the time.
Poor computer equipment ? or lack of understanding that invalid data is detected as invalid.?
If you are throwing doubt about the validy of this decode then treat the others also as suspect !! You cannot pick and choose.
I fully agree, all claims have to meet the criteria, yours does not.
I cannot recall getting false/corrupt decodes, its seems to be all or nothing.
Lack of experience.
It seems odd that it was CX2 a genuine call prefix why was it not CB, CZ , CY, C31, CL7  etc then it would raise some suspicion.
Try to understand the decoding principles, Joe will help you.
You are now guessing that it was WG2XCT ---------- is WSPR a guessamode if you do not like what you see guess what it might be!!
There you go twisting what I said to fit your argument, I made no guesses, just an observation based on facts which could help you to get a valid decode, i.e. turn your beam to the West. 
I have an open mind about such events but MIRACLES seems to be the flavour of the month,  I am just carried along with the flow !!
Oh

Eddie
 
g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: g3zjo
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR DX

Hi Mal

On 18/02/2013 09:26, mal hamilton wrote:
MF
Some good DX about this past couple of days
this morning
0916 -25 1.4 0.475745 2 CX4DVF 13
Well at least the system wasn't stupid enough to think it was a valid decode and add it to the database.

There really aren't that many false decodes if the RX signal is free of spurii. May be it was a mix of my enormous signal, you received me at that time, with a sprog at your end.

Or maybe you shouldn't be getting sarcastic maybe you should be getting excited. VK2DAG transmitted at that time.

More likely though with the coincidence of characters in the  Call and the QRG it could have been WG2XCT also co timed.

 
This must indeed be a MIRACLE mode
 
Its not doing bad at all lately is it.

Eddie
de G3KEV
 


--------------040109030603030404080909--