Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8312238000093; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:28:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U775V-0004bJ-T2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:27:37 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U775V-0004bA-G4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:27:37 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U775T-0004Ox-Qr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:27:36 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r1HGREVm027135 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:27:14 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r1HGREMc030259 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:27:14 +0100 Message-ID: <512104DD.70107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:27:09 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5120F58D.8040001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <004101ce0d23$3acf8ca0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <5120F95F.5010609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5120FDB4.3040802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id r1HGREVm027135 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Andy, thanks for the nice report :-) So this would be suitable for a QSO i think :-) However there were no audible (or visible) signals on 136.5 during the time i called CQ. Now back to beacon transmissions for the eventual newcomers [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: a6b6ffaf48fdddf1ed5c25dc4bf03ee1 Subject: Re: LF: Re: CW beacon on LF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14951210535655f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Andy, thanks for the nice report :-) So this would be suitable for a QSO i=20 think :-) However there were no audible (or visible) signals on 136.5 during the=20 time i called CQ. Now back to beacon transmissions for the eventual=20 newcomers Good luck for a new VK detection. Now it's the time, so hurry to go back=20 to MF :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 17.02.2013 17:12, schrieb Andr=E9 Guy=E9: > Stefan, > > switching from 474.2 to 136.5 CW. you just finish your CQ. 599 +++=20 > here. The beverage is in your direction ! Noise is S2. > > Andy; > > -----Message d'origine----- From: Stefan Sch=E4fer > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 4:56 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Re: CW beacon on LF > > PS: Certainly a QSO is no problem if you have a suitable TX/ANTENNA so = i > can hear you. > > 73, Stefan > >> >> Am 17.02.2013 16:26, schrieb mal hamilton: >>> Stefan >>> I can fire up for a QSO if you have a suitable RX/ANTENNA to hear me >>> de mal/g3kev >>> > >