Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9F8B6380000CA; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:58:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U76bw-0004LG-87 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:57:04 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U76bv-0004L7-PG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:57:03 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U76bu-0004IQ-2J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:57:02 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r1HFufbX016833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:56:41 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r1HFufgS029260 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:56:41 +0100 Message-ID: <5120FDB4.3040802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:56:36 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5120F58D.8040001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <004101ce0d23$3acf8ca0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <5120F95F.5010609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <5120F95F.5010609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: PS: Certainly a QSO is no problem if you have a suitable TX/ANTENNA so i can hear you. 73, Stefan > > Am 17.02.2013 16:26, schrieb mal hamilton: >> Stefan >> I can fire up for a QSO if you have a suitable RX/ANTENNA to hear me >> de mal/g3kev >> [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558 Subject: Re: LF: Re: CW beacon on LF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14a5120fe112b50 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none PS: Certainly a QSO is no problem if you have a suitable TX/ANTENNA so i can hear you. 73, Stefan > > Am 17.02.2013 16:26, schrieb mal hamilton: >> Stefan >> I can fire up for a QSO if you have a suitable RX/ANTENNA to hear me >> de mal/g3kev >>