Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 955AA3800009E; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 05:34:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U71Yn-00020J-WB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:33:29 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U71Yn-00020A-Ch for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:33:29 +0000 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U71Yh-00035z-NM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:33:28 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtICAJ6ZIFECZMxs/2dsb2JhbAANN7kxiACDUWUYNFsIAQGyX5I6j1SDKgOWLJNf X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,682,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="400309332" Received: from host-2-100-204-108.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.204.108]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2013 10:33:02 +0000 Message-ID: <5120B1DD.3@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:33:01 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130216-2, 16/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi LF I am not stable enough, or is it the radio, to run WSPR15 on 600m. For those stations that can / do it would not be easy to run WSPR2 and WSPR15 at the same time, within those limits is anyone seriously studying the results. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558 Subject: LF: WSPR2-15 600m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cb5120b244293d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi LF I am not stable enough, or is it the radio, to run WSPR15 on 600m. For those stations that can / do it would not be easy to run WSPR2 and WSPR15 at the same time, within those limits is anyone seriously studying the results. Does WSPR15 really achieve anything that WSPR2 does not? Eddie G3ZJO