Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4294738000093; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:59:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U6reD-0007gL-50 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:58:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U6reC-0007gC-AK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:58:24 +0000 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U6reA-0000nL-7j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 23:58:23 +0000 Received: from uucp by elvis.franken.de with local-rmail (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1U6rdt-0006z7-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:58:05 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.164] (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by mbsks.zwiebeltuete.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D45B12E2D0 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:56:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <51201C16.6060300@mbsks.franken.de> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 00:53:58 +0100 From: Roland Bruestle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <815B99E40E894F25830C0490ED4D418B@AGB> <511FF7B6.7040309@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <002701ce0c90$685b4940$3911dbc0$@it> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Mauro, Ale, Mauro, nice receiving. I didn't change any power. The conditions must have changed. This are the nice surprises of our hobby. ciao, Roland DL3NDR Am 16.02.2013 23:05, schrieb IK1WVQ Mauro: > Hi, > > also here the signal is increased at 21:15 > > 2013-02-16 20:45 DL3NDR 0.475817 -13 0 JN59no 0.5 IK1WVQ > JN44cb 655 201 > 2013-02-16 21:15 DL3NDR 0.475818 -9 0 JN59no 0.5 IK1WVQ > JN44cb 655 201 > 2013-02-16 21:30 DL3NDR 0.475818 -8 0 JN59no 0.5 IK1WVQ > JN44cb 655 201 > > 73 de Mauro IK1WVQ > > > > > At 22.56 16/02/13, you wrote: >> Hi Roland, >> did you change power or other at 21:15 ? >> I see +15dB of gain :) >> >> 73s >> Ale >> IW3SGT >> http://www.webalice.it/iw3sgt/ > > > > [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [193.175.24.41 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f3d1da032404cd5ad9531631c09e3b44 Subject: Re: LF: DL3NDR captureS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060108050509020702010601" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d409051201d6e7edc X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060108050509020702010601 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Mauro, Ale, Mauro, nice receiving. I didn't change any power. The conditions must have changed. This are the nice surprises of our hobby. ciao, Roland DL3NDR Am 16.02.2013 23:05, schrieb IK1WVQ Mauro: > Hi, > > also here the signal is increased at 21:15 > > 2013-02-16 20:45 DL3NDR 0.475817 -13 0 JN59no 0.5 IK1WVQ > JN44cb 655 201 > 2013-02-16 21:15 DL3NDR 0.475818 -9 0 JN59no 0.5 IK1WVQ > JN44cb 655 201 > 2013-02-16 21:30 DL3NDR 0.475818 -8 0 JN59no 0.5 IK1WVQ > JN44cb 655 201 > > 73 de Mauro IK1WVQ > > > > > At 22.56 16/02/13, you wrote: >> Hi Roland, >> did you change power or other at 21:15 ? >> I see +15dB of gain :) >> >> 73s >> Ale >> IW3SGT >> http://www.webalice.it/iw3sgt/ > > > > --------------060108050509020702010601 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Mauro,  Ale,
Mauro, nice receiving.
I didn't change any power. The conditions must have changed. This are the nice surprises of our hobby.

ciao,
Roland DL3NDR


Am 16.02.2013 23:05, schrieb IK1WVQ Mauro:
Hi,

also here the signal is increased at 21:15

 2013-02-16 20:45  DL3NDR  0.475817  -13  0  JN59no  0.5  IK1WVQ  JN44cb  655  201
 2013-02-16 21:15  DL3NDR  0.475818  -9  0  JN59no  0.5  IK1WVQ  JN44cb  655  201
 2013-02-16 21:30  DL3NDR  0.475818  -8  0  JN59no  0.5  IK1WVQ  JN44cb  655  201

73 de Mauro IK1WVQ




At 22.56 16/02/13, you wrote:
Hi Roland,
did you change power or other at 21:15 ?
I see +15dB of gain :)

73s
Ale
IW3SGT
http://www.webalice.it/iw3sgt/





--------------060108050509020702010601--