Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9BF7E38000081; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:53:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U6pgC-0006iO-81 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:52:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U6pgB-0006iF-S1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:52:19 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U6pgA-0000Dx-33 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:52:18 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAHzgH1ECZMrs/2dsb2JhbAANN71GgliBF4MSAQEBAQMyAQVRCwkPCRYPCQMCAQIBRRMIAQGyB5Jnjz4WgyoDliyTXw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,678,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="418881407" Received: from host-2-100-202-236.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.202.236]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2013 21:51:57 +0000 Message-ID: <511FFF7C.9020905@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:51:56 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <2282795.WEYH53gDWV@fbox.localdomain> <0739D17A209E4085947C84C3590A8B5F@F6CNIHP> <511FFC06.3090906@psk31.plus.com> <511FFD46.1070905@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <511FFD46.1070905@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130216-0, 16/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Come on Stefan 2 way possible if there was no Web SDR involved this was WSPR2 I think. Eddie [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR 2 and WSPR 15 on 630m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404e511fffe63ce5 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Come on Stefan 2 way possible if there was no Web SDR involved this was WSPR2 I think. Eddie On 16/02/2013 21:42, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > Oh! > > Am 16.02.2013 22:37, schrieb g3zjo: >> Andy >> >> Was this direct? >> >> 2013-02-16 16:44 VK1DSH 0.475078 -29 0 >> QF44ms 50 F6CNI/BEV JN19qb 16832 310 >> >> Eddie G3ZJO >> >> On 16/02/2013 14:51, André Guyé wrote: >>> Hello Colin >>> >>> On day light time your signal is now very good when you transmit >>> WSPR 2 and WSPR 15 on 630 m band. >>> >>> Congrats. >>> >>> Andy F6CNI. >>> >>> >>> >> > >