Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C381438000084; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 15:29:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U6oN5-0005s4-BT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:28:31 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U6oN4-0005rv-T8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:28:30 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U6oN2-00088k-9X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:28:29 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1GKSRtD025759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:28:27 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r1GKSRTV013123 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:28:27 +0100 Message-ID: <511FEBE6.20004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:28:22 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <373303AB8563458085817252D5CBCA35@SV8CSHP> <511EB40A.8050701@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <511EB40A.8050701@broadpark.no> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Steinar, Yes, it looks like that. At least there is no announcement at http://wsprnet.org/drupal/ 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: Re: LF: WSPRX latest software version Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600e511fec276e57 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Steinar, Yes, it looks like that. At least there is no announcement at http://wsprnet.org/drupal/ 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 15.02.2013 23:17, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: > Hi all, > > Is 07r2960 the latest ver of WSPR-X? > > > LA5VNA Steinar > loc:JO59jq > Spam filtering: STRONG > > >