Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 82113380000A0; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 05:55:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U6fPr-0003OH-NZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:54:47 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U6fPr-0003O8-8S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:54:47 +0000 Received: from mailout02.t-online.de ([194.25.134.17]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U6fPp-0005t2-Ia for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:54:46 +0000 Received: from fwd05.aul.t-online.de (fwd05.aul.t-online.de ) by mailout02.t-online.de with smtp id 1U6fPU-0003YK-1M; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:54:24 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (XV95GgZpQhRoJEXTqQFWoW5nA41qkF4Gp-OgkEvstpWylqRlnN4bKEkmByaIEreZKM@[80.187.106.169]) by fwd05.t-online.de with esmtp id 1U6fPL-256Bay0; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:54:15 +0100 Message-ID: <511F655A.7060505@t-online.de> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 11:54:18 +0100 From: "Dr. Wolf Ostwald" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-ID: XV95GgZpQhRoJEXTqQFWoW5nA41qkF4Gp-OgkEvstpWylqRlnN4bKEkmByaIEreZKM X-TOI-MSGID: bbf50dfb-7379-456e-be82-a9dc7a4f6891 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Loss in unloaded circuits is lower with hi Q as Clemens said. The loss factor is 1/Q this little formula says it all 73 de wolf df2py [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.25.134.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_HK_NAME_DR T_HK_NAME_DR 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: 61f253ce45236799bfc06b43f9779702 Subject: Re: LF: Re: how to increase the Q of my loading coil? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404e511f65ba5d53 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Loss in unloaded circuits is lower with hi Q as Clemens said. The loss factor is 1/Q this little formula says it all 73 de wolf df2py