Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 89EF6380000AD; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:23:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U5IWh-0008Ky-5W for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:16:11 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U5IWg-0008Kl-O7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:16:10 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U5IWf-000853-46 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:16:09 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r1CGFm3r018841 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:15:48 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r1CGFlss015524; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:15:47 +0100 Message-ID: <511A6AAF.7080109@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:15:43 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: Vasily Savchenko References: <001601ce091f$11b4f0b0$7401a8c0@LFMF> <511A68F8.3040402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <511A68F8.3040402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id r1CGFm3r018841 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: PS: I started the QRSS-60 transmission on 476.172 kHz again. Now it's sunset here (if there would be no clouds!!!) so this may be a good time to the east! 73, Stefan Am 12.02.2013 17:08, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > Hi Jay, > > Thank you for monitoring! > That spreading is new to me. Where does it come from? Permanent and > rapid phase changes? > Oh and thanks for the capture of my recent LF over night transmission. > I didn't yet find that image :-) > > Due to the spreading, it looks like QRSS-120 is not useful. And our > path consists mostly of water. > > I guess it would be a challenge to reach RN3AGC or UA4WPF or UA0AET or > UA0SNV, that path would be mostly above ground.. We will see how far > we can get in the typical slow modes using spectrograms. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 12.02.2013 13:47, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: >> Stefan and T/A enthusiasts >> >> Good copy on 630 meters last night. Signal was consistent the entire >> night until fadeout at 0645Z. >> Representative capture, with the usual 'spreading', at >> http://www.w1vd.com/interestinggrab.html . >> >> Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4e3b1488273adbbe9757d6bdd5adf219 Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC in CT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404b511a6c6746da X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none PS: I started the QRSS-60 transmission on 476.172 kHz again. Now it's=20 sunset here (if there would be no clouds!!!) so this may be a good time=20 to the east! 73, Stefan Am 12.02.2013 17:08, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: > Hi Jay, > > Thank you for monitoring! > That spreading is new to me. Where does it come from? Permanent and=20 > rapid phase changes? > Oh and thanks for the capture of my recent LF over night transmission.=20 > I didn't yet find that image :-) > > Due to the spreading, it looks like QRSS-120 is not useful. And our=20 > path consists mostly of water. > > I guess it would be a challenge to reach RN3AGC or UA4WPF or UA0AET or=20 > UA0SNV, that path would be mostly above ground.. We will see how far=20 > we can get in the typical slow modes using spectrograms. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 12.02.2013 13:47, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: >> Stefan and T/A enthusiasts >> >> Good copy on 630 meters last night. Signal was consistent the entire=20 >> night until fadeout at 0645Z. >> Representative capture, with the usual 'spreading', at=20 >> http://www.w1vd.com/interestinggrab.html . >> >> Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2