Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8EC5C38000089; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:23:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U4IR0-0007kr-Kx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:58:10 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U4IQz-0007ki-Ri for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:58:09 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U4IQy-0002zW-6K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:58:08 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r19LvkSl027896 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 22:57:46 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r19LvkLr006355 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 22:57:46 +0100 Message-ID: <5116C654.6050407@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 22:57:40 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51156D43.60008@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <211E4AB2ED7F4267BF50AD54954D9B25@SV8CSHP>,<511577DE.2070207@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB6F9FC@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <51169727.7030201@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>,<4890CB4509944C2B8987C7617FCCA6DC@SV8CSHP> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB6FBE9@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <98B2DA48CA1C49DBA662AD57606F0A37@AGB> In-Reply-To: <98B2DA48CA1C49DBA662AD57606F0A37@AGB> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Spiros, I must admit, OP is possible with the JUMA while WSPR is not. So you could give it a try. But don't forget us poor grabber runners completely :-) (I know, i haven't been any better in the last weeks, except last night) :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 9ca91679b330d65f05d707c2d2b164fe Subject: Re: LF: RE: SV8CS on LF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60155116cc5a4a5e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Spiros, I must admit, OP is possible with the JUMA while WSPR is not. So you could give it a try. But don't forget us poor grabber runners completely :-) (I know, i haven't been any better in the last weeks, except last night) :-) 73, Stefan Am 09.02.2013 22:06, schrieb Graham: > Spiros > > Try OP32 , that level of drift is inside the max limits of > OP32 , ( round 1 Hz ) > > You could set timer = 0 , then temperature would tend to > stabilise , each 32 min cycle would be independent in terms of > decode and +/- temp drift > > RN7T looks to be the closest OP32 monitor to you and Wolf > showing as DL-SWL > > 73 -G.. > > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Rik Strobbe" > Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 7:47 PM > To: > Subject: LF: RE: SV8CS on LF > >> Hi Spiros, >> >> drift is about 0.5Hz on 137kHz = +/- 70Hz drift on the 20MHz xtal >> oscillator of the DDS VFO. >> One should expect better. Do you have large temperature variations? >> >> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >> >> ________________________________________ >> Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios >> [zante@otenet.gr] >> Verzonden: zaterdag 9 februari 2013 19:46 >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Onderwerp: LF: SV8CS on LF >> >> Thank you Stefan. >> Looking for any QSO. >> Stability very bad from YUMA transmitter on QRSS-60 >> 73, Spiros >> SV8CS >> >> >> >> Spiros, LF, >> >> Again a nice signal. >> >> 73, Stefan >