Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 69FA6380000D6; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 15:39:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U4GMk-0006ts-Cr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:45:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U4GMj-0006tf-VB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:45:37 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U4GMi-0002N2-DO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:45:36 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAEiLFlFcEFpI/2dsb2JhbAANOME8gxIBAQEBAzIBBVELCQgEAQEBCRYPCQMCAQIBPQgTBgIBAbQfknuOYIMqA5Ykk1k X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,634,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="418109982" Received: from host-92-16-90-72.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.16.90.72]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2013 19:45:15 +0000 Message-ID: <5116A74A.3040707@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:45:14 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5116977F.50108@npton.plus.com> <51169844.60906@psk31.plus.com> <511699B8.4000208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51169C65.2060800@psk31.plus.com> <5116A1E6.5040806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <43D5229E1A7F4158BF27A01B1FAF6E4D@AGB> In-Reply-To: <43D5229E1A7F4158BF27A01B1FAF6E4D@AGB> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130209-0, 09/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 09/02/2013 19:31, Graham wrote: > Did some one mention Opera ? > Must have been a Phantom. > > From: "Stefan Schäfer" > Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 7:22 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: WSPR Test > >> >> Am 09.02.2013 19:58, schrieb g3zjo: >>> No time reference just very accurate PIC timing which is good for >>> weeks. >> >> Ah yes. BTW when using e.g. a netbook in /p WSPR tests it is totally >> sufficient to sync the PC clock manually to your wrist watch (which >> was synced at home), if necessary. So it is not really a pro-argument >> for Opera that no timing is required. I've recently tested that at >> home with my own transmissions... >> >>> PA, yes tiny by your standards, but it is the PA that has been >>> growing recently. >> :-) >> >>>> Pictures please! >>> Oh dear do you really like rats nests? >> ...and dirty fingers, yes ;-) >> >> 73, Stefan >> >>> >>> Eddie >> > > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 6ffbd2c9950b634d6cc91f9565b01a8b Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: WSPR Test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40865116b4065af7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none On 09/02/2013 19:31, Graham wrote: > Did some one mention Opera ? > Must have been a Phantom. > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Stefan Schäfer" > Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 7:22 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: WSPR Test > >> >> Am 09.02.2013 19:58, schrieb g3zjo: >>> No time reference just very accurate PIC timing which is good for >>> weeks. >> >> Ah yes. BTW when using e.g. a netbook in /p WSPR tests it is totally >> sufficient to sync the PC clock manually to your wrist watch (which >> was synced at home), if necessary. So it is not really a pro-argument >> for Opera that no timing is required. I've recently tested that at >> home with my own transmissions... >> >>> PA, yes tiny by your standards, but it is the PA that has been >>> growing recently. >> :-) >> >>>> Pictures please! >>> Oh dear do you really like rats nests? >> ...and dirty fingers, yes ;-) >> >> 73, Stefan >> >>> >>> Eddie >> > >