Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F0198380000AA; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 15:39:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U4GDN-0006jA-WF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:35:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U4GDN-0006j1-Fq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:35:57 +0000 Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([195.4.92.91]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U4GDL-0002Jb-Rz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:35:56 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.141] (helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1U4GD0-0003hb-2j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:35:34 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:59975 helo=mjail1.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1U4GCz-0007mF-U8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:35:34 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.12] (port=35531 helo=2.mx.freenet.de) by mjail1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1U4GAs-0004wB-34 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:33:22 +0100 Received: from blfd-4d0882e1.pool.mediaways.net ([77.8.130.225]:3469 helo=[192.168.178.22]) by 2.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1U4GAr-0000XZ-RP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:33:22 +0100 Message-ID: <5116A481.4030004@freenet.de> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:33:21 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RSGB LF Group at blacksheep X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Interesting .. did I miss something being discussed on any of the two LF/MF groups ? Quoting the bandplan suggested by someone for the IARU region 1 conference: "472.000 - 472.150 CW BEACONS ONLY" ? ? ? ? ? ? ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.91 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: cd16d8c2fb75309db133b7de4adb1391 Subject: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Fw: LF: Digital Modes at IARU Region 1 Vienna 2013 - Bandplan for the 630m band Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020905090106090106040705" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40825116b3f16fd4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020905090106090106040705 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Interesting .. did I miss something being discussed on any of the two LF/MF groups ? Quoting the bandplan suggested by someone for the IARU region 1 conference: "472.000 - 472.150 CW BEACONS ONLY" ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Heavens, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ! 73, Wolf ---- > All Just spotted this on the digital-yahoo group Hiding in the list is - Bandplan for the 630m band Didn't take long , problem is , for some this will be part of there licence regulation's G.. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/message/43767 Digital modes are among the topics to be discussed at the IARU Region 1 2013 Interim Meeting in Vienna April 20-21. --------------020905090106090106040705 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Interesting .. did I miss something being discussed on any of the two LF/MF groups ?

Quoting the bandplan suggested by someone for the IARU region 1 conference:

 "472.000 - 472.150  CW BEACONS ONLY"  ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

Heavens, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !

73,
  Wolf


----
>

 

 
All
 
Just spotted  this  on the   digital-yahoo   group  
 
Hiding in the  list is  - Bandplan for the 630m band
Didn't  take long  , problem is  , for  some  this will  be  part of there  licence   regulation's
 
 
G..
 
 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/message/43767
 
 
Digital modes are among the topics to be discussed at the IARU Region 1 2013
Interim Meeting in Vienna April 20-21. --------------020905090106090106040705--