Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 54B8538000084; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:23:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U4G0Y-0006UR-J4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:22:42 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U4G0Y-0006UI-6U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:22:42 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U4G0W-0002E9-Lp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:22:41 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r19JMJmw007145 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:22:20 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r19JMJ4b003546 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:22:19 +0100 Message-ID: <5116A1E6.5040806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:22:14 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5116977F.50108@npton.plus.com> <51169844.60906@psk31.plus.com> <511699B8.4000208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51169C65.2060800@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <51169C65.2060800@psk31.plus.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 09.02.2013 19:58, schrieb g3zjo: > No time reference just very accurate PIC timing which is good for weeks. Ah yes. BTW when using e.g. a netbook in /p WSPR tests it is totally sufficient to sync the PC clock manually to your wrist watch (which was synced at home), if necessary. So it is not really a pro-argument for Opera that no timing is required. I've recently tested that at home with my own transmissions... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 5c1f37c04fc013ebbc2288fd3791d043 Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: WSPR Test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4095116a24129c8 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Am 09.02.2013 19:58, schrieb g3zjo: > No time reference just very accurate PIC timing which is good for weeks. Ah yes. BTW when using e.g. a netbook in /p WSPR tests it is totally sufficient to sync the PC clock manually to your wrist watch (which was synced at home), if necessary. So it is not really a pro-argument for Opera that no timing is required. I've recently tested that at home with my own transmissions... > PA, yes tiny by your standards, but it is the PA that has been growing > recently. :-) >> Pictures please! > Oh dear do you really like rats nests? ...and dirty fingers, yes ;-) 73, Stefan > > Eddie