Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 53513380000BC; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 14:23:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U4Fe0-0006L6-MQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:59:24 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U4Fe0-0006Kx-6J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:59:24 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U4Fdx-000296-PY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:59:23 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBABScFlFcEFpI/2dsb2JhbAANOL1Bg3uDEgEBAQEDMgEFUQsJDwkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBtCKSeY1SgQ6DKgOWJJNZgWYk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,634,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="418641194" Received: from host-92-16-90-72.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.16.90.72]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2013 18:58:46 +0000 Message-ID: <51169C65.2060800@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:58:45 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5116977F.50108@npton.plus.com> <51169844.60906@psk31.plus.com> <511699B8.4000208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <511699B8.4000208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130209-0, 09/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan On 09/02/2013 18:47, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > Eddie, > > Stand alone? Without a PC, just the PIC and a time reference and a > tiny PA? > Yes, no PC, exactly the same as I have always used since my first venture on QRP on to 500KHz. No time reference just very accurate PIC timing which is good for weeks. PA, yes tiny by your standards, but it is the PA that has been growing recently. > Pictures please! Oh dear do you really like rats nests? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 046f068074e745d5c60ca47deee9b503 Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: WSPR Test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b985116a21e7222 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan On 09/02/2013 18:47, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > Eddie, > > Stand alone? Without a PC, just the PIC and a time reference and a > tiny PA? > Yes, no PC, exactly the same as I have always used since my first venture on QRP on to 500KHz. No time reference just very accurate PIC timing which is good for weeks. PA, yes tiny by your standards, but it is the PA that has been growing recently. > Pictures please! Oh dear do you really like rats nests? Eddie > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 09.02.2013 19:41, schrieb g3zjo: >> >> Hi LF WSPR'ers >> >> I am testing a stand alone WSPR modular system, I must apologies for the >> arbitrary power level displayed as the Code is fixed on PIC and the >> power level is variable.. >> >> Any comments on the apparent EIRP compared to other signals at the same >> distance are welcome. >> >> The set up is not finalised, I have just temporarily added a mechanical >> relay on the enable line to get it TX'ing every 10 mins. >> >> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >> >> > >