Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0D12D380000A4; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:16:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U2SQj-0005NG-Ec for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:14:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U2SQj-0005N7-0X for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:14:17 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U2SQg-0004Qb-Oe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 20:14:15 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r14KDa1R006351 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:13:36 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r14KDa78006047 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:13:36 +0100 Message-ID: <5110166B.5020406@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:13:31 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id r14KDa1R006351 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Victor, Thanks. I've just done some CW QSOs with the new FETs, with DF5QG, G3KEV, G3XIZ, DK6SX/p and DD7PC :-) Now in this moment the first WSPR-15 transmission is running. The PA's dimensions are minimised, it has no real heat sink, just an aluminium plate. Now i'm using an external cooling with a fan. I think it should be no problem now. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 61577e2058c0d3bf1737d7de6ed6eb16 Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cb51101700119f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Victor, Thanks. I've just done some CW QSOs with the new FETs, with DF5QG, G3KEV, G3XIZ,=20 DK6SX/p and DD7PC :-) Now in this moment the first WSPR-15 transmission is running. The PA's=20 dimensions are minimised, it has no real heat sink, just an aluminium=20 plate. Now i'm using an external cooling with a fan. I think it should=20 be no problem now. Good luck for your tests. Unfortunately WSJT-X does not work on this PC=20 so i can't give you a report. Hopefully someone is watching for us at=20 all ;-) Soon we will see. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 04.02.2013 19:55, schrieb victor13@online.nl: > Good luck with your repairs Stefan,I am on the air at 1605Hz audio 25% = Hope > the fets will last! > > 73 > > Victor > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]Namens Stefan Sch=E4fer > Verzonden: maandag 4 februari 2013 18:00 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Joe Taylor; Vasily Savchenko; Garry > and Linda Hess; Douglas D. Williams; Andy - KU4XR > Onderwerp: LF: Re: Testing WSPR-15 on 630m > > > Oh, the PA seems to be damaged. This may come from the rain which > detunes the antenna and rises the PA losses. Furthermore it is a 15 > minute "key-down" transmission and some of the thermal time constants > seem to be well below 15 minutes ;-) > I will have to repair the PA. Back on air in 1 hour or so. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 04.02.2013 17:29, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: > =20 >> Dear LF/MF group, >> >> This night i would like to test WSPR-15 on 630m, for the first time. >> The condx seem to be sub-optimal, anyway, just for the fun. >> >> I just changed the TX frequency to (474.2 + 1.615) kHz and will start >> in 50% mode beginning 16:30 UTC. >> I'm still running the small 12V PA at about 50W RF power. It's rainy >> here and the losses are quite high, anyway... >> >> Reports are very apprechiated. >> >> Vy 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> >> =20 > > > ----- > Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht. > Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com > Versie: 2013.0.2897 / Virusdatabase: 2639/6081 - datum van uitgifte: > 02/04/13 > > > > =20