Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7FF7D3800009D; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:23:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U271i-0003Q4-2f for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 21:23:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U271h-0003Pv-FR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 21:23:01 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U271f-0001PW-Ln for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 21:23:00 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r13LMwAF028335 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:22:58 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r13LMsgi002813 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:22:54 +0100 Message-ID: <510ED52D.4020706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 22:22:53 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001c01ce01fe$4d11b490$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <510E4A1A.6060005@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <510E4A1A.6060005@psk31.plus.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eddie, Is that really 5 mW ERP? Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2013-02-03 20:50 G3ZJO 0.475632 -26 1 IO92ng 0.005 DK7FC JN49ik 742 111 That would be quite remarkable over that distance over land. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 34d483c57c7a6bf26c25db3c8765d5fc Subject: Re: LF: wspr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070606020606000403010300" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40c9510ed56c36dd X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070606020606000403010300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Eddie, Is that really 5 mW ERP? Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2013-02-03 20:50 G3ZJO 0.475632 -26 1 IO92ng 0.005 DK7FC JN49ik 742 111 That would be quite remarkable over that distance over land. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 03.02.2013 12:29, schrieb g3zjo: > On 03/02/2013 11:04, mal hamilton wrote: >> MF >> At 1056 z there were 3 stations active about the same strength on >> waterfall but only one decoded PA3EGO >> I think it must be a Timing sync problem somewhere. I suppose ideally >> everyone should be locked to the same time standard. >> g3kev > It's your end Mal, I see that Roger didn't do a runner after posting > malicious urls. So download atomic kitten or any of the standard time > utilities and get you computer time sorted. > Mind you can do it by hand, I did for years.and even during M/S QSO's > because my old computer could loose 3 or 4 seconds whilst making a 1 > min transmission, blimey those were the days. There is only one > Standard time and all time servers will be the same. > > Eddie > --------------070606020606000403010300 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Eddie,

Is that really 5 mW ERP?
Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
 2013-02-03 20:50   G3ZJO   0.475632   -26   1   IO92ng   0.005   DK7FC   JN49ik   742   111

That would be quite remarkable over that distance over land.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 03.02.2013 12:29, schrieb g3zjo:
On 03/02/2013 11:04, mal hamilton wrote:
MF
At 1056 z there were 3 stations active about the same strength on waterfall but only one decoded PA3EGO
I think it must be a Timing sync problem somewhere. I suppose ideally everyone should be locked to the same time standard.
g3kev
 
It's your end Mal, I see that Roger didn't do a runner after posting malicious urls. So download atomic kitten or any of the standard time utilities and get you computer time sorted.
Mind you can do it by hand, I did for years.and even during M/S QSO's because my old computer could loose 3 or 4 seconds whilst making a 1 min transmission, blimey those were the days. There is only one Standard time and all time servers will be the same.

Eddie

--------------070606020606000403010300--