Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CF24038000097; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 16:14:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U26sT-0003Io-BE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 21:13:29 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U26sS-0003If-Qr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 21:13:28 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U26sQ-0001M7-Bb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 21:13:27 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r13LDPnM026907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:13:25 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r13LDN2O002619 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:13:23 +0100 Message-ID: <510ED2F0.1030001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 22:13:20 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: The best is not to use a HF TRX for the MF/LF stuff but to use a simple downconverter, at least for the TX side. A simple NE612 mixer and a xtal (e.g. 1.8432 MHz / 4 by using a CD4013) and a reasonable filter is what i'm using here. Takes 50 mA (ish) at 12V, is compact, is stable, is cheap, is /p... [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: e51657317b06d9cbe905ec682fad6602 Subject: Re: LF: 817 drift Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060903050705030106070709" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608d510ed3340cb4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060903050705030106070709 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The best is not to use a HF TRX for the MF/LF stuff but to use a simple downconverter, at least for the TX side. A simple NE612 mixer and a xtal (e.g. 1.8432 MHz / 4 by using a CD4013) and a reasonable filter is what i'm using here. Takes 50 mA (ish) at 12V, is compact, is stable, is cheap, is /p... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 03.02.2013 21:38, schrieb Roger Lapthorn: > Thanks for the tip Lawrence. I will try a lower supply voltage first. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > > On 3 February 2013 19:45, Laurence KL1 X > > wrote: > > Roger - I had the same drift issue and added the txco with little > improvement - best was when unit was powered driven by lower > voltage - think mine is set around 9.6V at the moment and less > heat..it also sits in the cool garage...think Dex also found the same > > Laurence KL 1 X > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:23:35 +0000 > From: rogerlapthorn@gmail.com > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > ; > rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk > > Subject: LF: WSPR15 - sort of success > > After several attempts Tom G8HUH managed to decode my WSPR15 > transmission on 137.607kHz this evening. As the FT817 was drifting > around 4Hz in the 15 minute TX slot with the FT817 on 1837.607kHz > (I was using a stabilised sig gen for the LO at 1.7MHz), I think > this was messing up the decodes as Tom only gave me -32 and -34dB > S/N whereas I have been getting some 6dB BETTER than this with the > WSPR2 transmissions. > > If WSPR15 is going to succeed for me I need a more stable rig (or > a 0.5ppm TXCO fitted to the FT817) or a fan to force cool the > FT817 - even when running 500mW! > > I'll leave the rig on for a little while longer, but will probably > revert to WSPR2 for the rest of the evening. > > Thank you Tom G8HUH, and Trevor G0KTN, for working with me for the > last couple of hours to get this as good as I could. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > --------------060903050705030106070709 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The best is not to use a HF TRX for the MF/LF stuff but to use a simple downconverter, at least for the TX side. A simple NE612 mixer and a xtal (e.g. 1.8432 MHz / 4 by using a CD4013) and a reasonable filter is what i'm using here. Takes 50 mA (ish) at 12V, is compact, is stable, is cheap, is /p...

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 03.02.2013 21:38, schrieb Roger Lapthorn:
Thanks for the tip Lawrence. I will try a lower supply voltage first.

73s
Roger G3XBM


On 3 February 2013 19:45, Laurence KL1 X <hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com> wrote:
Roger - I had the same drift issue and added the txco with little improvement - best was when unit was powered driven by lower voltage - think mine is set around 9.6V at the moment and less heat..it also sits in the cool garage...think Dex also found the same

Laurence KL 1 X


Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:23:35 +0000
From: rogerlapthorn@gmail.com
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk
Subject: LF: WSPR15 - sort of success

After several attempts Tom G8HUH managed to decode my WSPR15 transmission on 137.607kHz this evening. As the FT817 was drifting around 4Hz in the 15 minute TX slot with the FT817 on 1837.607kHz (I was using a stabilised sig gen for the LO at 1.7MHz), I think this was messing up the decodes as Tom only gave me -32 and -34dB S/N whereas I have been getting some 6dB BETTER than this with the WSPR2 transmissions.

If WSPR15 is going to succeed for me I need a more stable rig (or a 0.5ppm TXCO fitted to the FT817) or a fan to force cool the FT817 - even when running 500mW!

I'll leave the rig on for a little while longer, but will probably revert to WSPR2 for the rest of the evening.

Thank you Tom G8HUH, and Trevor G0KTN, for working with me for the last couple of hours to get this as good as I could.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--------------060903050705030106070709--