Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 55D9D380000A3; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 06:31:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U1xlk-0007Kx-CP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:29:56 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U1xlj-0007Ko-RY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:29:55 +0000 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U1xli-0008D1-7R for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:29:54 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBANsiDlECZMul/2dsb2JhbAANMAiMI680g3GDEgEBAQEDeRALBAEEDwkWDwkDAgECAUUTAQcBAbY4kkWNJoEDgykDlh+TTQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,592,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="564685197" Received: from host-2-100-203-165.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.203.165]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2013 11:29:32 +0000 Message-ID: <510E4A1A.6060005@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:29:30 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: mal hamilton References: <001c01ce01fe$4d11b490$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <001c01ce01fe$4d11b490$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130202-1, 02/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 03/02/2013 11:04, mal hamilton wrote: > MF > At 1056 z there were 3 stations active about the same strength on > waterfall but only one decoded PA3EGO > I think it must be a Timing sync problem somewhere. I suppose ideally > everyone should be locked to the same time standard. > g3kev It's your end Mal, I see that Roger didn't do a runner after posting malicious urls. So download atomic kitten or any of the standard time utilities and get you computer time sorted. Mind you can do it by hand, I did for years.and even during M/S QSO's because my old computer could loose 3 or 4 seconds whilst making a 1 min transmission, blimey those were the days. There is only one Standard time and all time servers will be the same. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: d7907c3bf895ca41e0bedc3fa074f0d4 Subject: Re: LF: wspr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060102000807000907020506" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4115510e4a9b1d51 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060102000807000907020506 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/02/2013 11:04, mal hamilton wrote: > MF > At 1056 z there were 3 stations active about the same strength on > waterfall but only one decoded PA3EGO > I think it must be a Timing sync problem somewhere. I suppose ideally > everyone should be locked to the same time standard. > g3kev It's your end Mal, I see that Roger didn't do a runner after posting malicious urls. So download atomic kitten or any of the standard time utilities and get you computer time sorted. Mind you can do it by hand, I did for years.and even during M/S QSO's because my old computer could loose 3 or 4 seconds whilst making a 1 min transmission, blimey those were the days. There is only one Standard time and all time servers will be the same. Eddie --------------060102000807000907020506 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/02/2013 11:04, mal hamilton wrote:
MF
At 1056 z there were 3 stations active about the same strength on waterfall but only one decoded PA3EGO
I think it must be a Timing sync problem somewhere. I suppose ideally everyone should be locked to the same time standard.
g3kev
 
It's your end Mal, I see that Roger didn't do a runner after posting malicious urls. So download atomic kitten or any of the standard time utilities and get you computer time sorted.
Mind you can do it by hand, I did for years.and even during M/S QSO's because my old computer could loose 3 or 4 seconds whilst making a 1 min transmission, blimey those were the days. There is only one Standard time and all time servers will be the same.

Eddie

--------------060102000807000907020506--