Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7A2833800009E; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:26:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U1gpe-0007eb-3U for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:24:50 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U1gpd-0007eS-Nk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:24:49 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U1gpc-0005UE-9J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:24:48 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBALtKDVFcGS8B/2dsb2JhbAANOLtZg3WDEgEBAQEDOFELCQ8JFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBAbcIkweOKYMpA5Yfk00 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,591,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="407682284" Received: from host-92-25-47-1.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.25.47.1]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2013 17:24:27 +0000 Message-ID: <510D4BC9.6020003@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 17:24:25 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <005001ce0131$ba6ddaf0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <510CF0B7.7060103@psk31.plus.com> <007001ce0139$042377c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <510CFB8E.9040706@psk31.plus.com> <008201ce0149$b5f58550$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <510D4A1F.1040506@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <510D4A1F.1040506@xs4all.nl> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130202-0, 02/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Albert On 02/02/2013 17:17, Albert wrote: > Gents, > > 1700 UTC already 25 accurate RX reports after one WSPR2 transmission > duration 1min 52 sec. > > Albert, PA0A > > > Yes and the reports are back before the end of the 2min TX slot.:-) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 4ad5f3f1a9241b934aaa5d0e23c9dc57 Subject: Re: LF: wspr decode Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db406510d4c4c1933 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Albert On 02/02/2013 17:17, Albert wrote: > Gents, > > 1700 UTC already 25 accurate RX reports after one WSPR2 transmission > duration 1min 52 sec. > > Albert, PA0A > > > Yes and the reports are back before the end of the 2min TX slot.:-) Eddie