Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by mtain-mk06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 67B0038000097;
	Sat,  2 Feb 2013 10:44:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1U1fEz-00057d-L6
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:42:53 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1U1fEz-00057U-8H
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:42:53 +0000
Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>)
	id 1U1fEx-0004bh-NB
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 15:42:52 +0000
Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204])
	by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r12Fgo49010744
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 16:42:50 +0100
Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206])
	by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r12FgopA023725
	for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 16:42:50 +0100
Message-ID: <510D33F5.5020206@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:42:45 +0100
From: =?windows-1252?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?=
 <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <bf17031b8a2b4e31b4b71572e9588046@kabelmail.de> <7F4CF64248DB4E6184E59688EA3B5435@Extensa>
In-Reply-To: <7F4CF64248DB4E6184E59688EA3B5435@Extensa>
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Am 02.02.2013 11:55, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter: > [...] > It learns
    us again that a stable signal is very- very- veryyyyy importand. Hi Peter,
    Yes, even veryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.7 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED      RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium
                              trust
                             [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD        Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
X-Scan-Signature: d7fcd9b75df8d1b09ddef9df028bd9ae
Subject: Re: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------060308060700050200060407"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618a510d344d7477
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060308060700050200060407
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Am 02.02.2013 11:55, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter:
> [...]
> It learns us again that a stable signal is very- very- veryyyyy importand.
Hi Peter,

Yes, even 
veryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy 
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:-))))


73, Stefan/DK7FC

PS: Still no trace of Uwe here...

--------------060308060700050200060407
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
Am 02.02.2013 11:55, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter:
<blockquote cite="mid:7F4CF64248DB4E6184E59688EA3B5435@Extensa"
 type="cite">
  <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
  <meta name="GENERATOR" content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19088">
  <style></style><font face="Georgia">[...]</font>
  <div><font face="Georgia">It learns us again that a stable signal is
very- very- veryyyyy importand.</font></div>
</blockquote>
Hi Peter, <br>
<br>
Yes, even
veryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br>
<br>
:-))))<br>
<br>
<br>
73, Stefan/DK7FC<br>
<br>
PS: Still no trace of Uwe here...<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------060308060700050200060407--