Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 613443800008F; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 08:50:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U1dT6-0003y4-J5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:49:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U1dT6-0003xv-30 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:49:20 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U1dT4-00045q-6I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:49:18 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAEj8DFFcGS8B/2dsb2JhbAANOL9OgxIBAQEBA4EFBAsJCAQBAQEJFggHCQMCAQIBNAkIEwYCAQG3EZMlkVIDlh+TTQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,590,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="407667874" Received: from host-92-25-47-1.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.25.47.1]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2013 13:48:57 +0000 Message-ID: <510D1946.4050400@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:48:54 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <005001ce0131$ba6ddaf0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <510CF0B7.7060103@psk31.plus.com> <007001ce0139$042377c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <510CFB8E.9040706@psk31.plus.com> <008201ce0149$b5f58550$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <008201ce0149$b5f58550$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130201-1, 01/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Mal Not necessarily if the station you copy is off time and you are compensating with miss timing you two will be right and the rest of the world wrong. Just set yours precisely. I will check timings of stations shortly, I have been acting despicably. Look away now. Beacon'ing. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 64bc660a83b79b15f4c44d2b2147e02d Subject: Re: LF: wspr decode Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050501010305050901000602" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db409510d19c122c8 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050501010305050901000602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mal Not necessarily if the station you copy is off time and you are compensating with miss timing you two will be right and the rest of the world wrong. Just set yours precisely. I will check timings of stations shortly, I have been acting despicably. Look away now. Beacon'ing. Eddie On 02/02/2013 13:32, mal hamilton wrote: > Eddie > My Logic---If I can decode one then that should apply to all the others > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* g3zjo > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Saturday, February 02, 2013 11:42 AM > *Subject:* Re: LF: wspr decode > > Simple one, but timing, is your timing OK? > > Eddie > > On 02/02/2013 11:32, mal hamilton wrote: >> I am seeing quite a lot of acty on the waterfall and you are >> probably there, 8 visible at present but Decode is a different story. >> Like I said if these same stns were on QRSS I would get an ID and >> you would probably be there also >> Most are audible with me and strong enough for a CW qso >> de g3kev >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* g3zjo >> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> >> *Sent:* Saturday, February 02, 2013 10:55 AM >> *Subject:* Re: LF: wspr decode >> >> On 02/02/2013 10:40, mal hamilton wrote: >>> Strangely enough I can only decode GW8MLA and there are >>> another several stns active at present on WSPR-2. Most are >>> strong and audible >>> de g3kev >> Well that will give you a rather distorted view of the >> usefulness of the mode then. >> >> And you don't see me, >> >> Beatles >> >> You think you've got everything you want >> And your bird can sing >> But you don't see me >> >> Do I remember the lyrics right? >> >> Eddie >> > --------------050501010305050901000602 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mal
Not necessarily if the station you copy is off time and you are compensating with miss timing you two will be right and the rest of the world wrong. Just set yours precisely.

I will check timings of stations shortly, I have been acting despicably. Look away now.
Beacon'ing.

Eddie
On 02/02/2013 13:32, mal hamilton wrote:
Eddie
My Logic---If I can decode one then that should apply to all the others
 
----- Original Message -----
From: g3zjo
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr decode

Simple one, but timing, is your timing OK?

Eddie

On 02/02/2013 11:32, mal hamilton wrote:
I am seeing quite a lot of acty on the waterfall and you are probably there, 8 visible at present but Decode is a different story.
Like I said if these same stns were on QRSS I would get an ID and you would probably be there also
Most are audible with me and strong enough for a CW qso
de g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From: g3zjo
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: LF: wspr decode

On 02/02/2013 10:40, mal hamilton wrote:
Strangely enough I can only decode GW8MLA and there are another several stns active at present on WSPR-2. Most are strong and audible
de g3kev
 
Well that will give you a rather distorted view of the usefulness of the mode then.

And you don't see me,

Beatles

You think you've got everything you want
And your bird can sing
But you don't see me

Do I remember the lyrics right?

Eddie


--------------050501010305050901000602--