Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F191138000088; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 15:39:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U4G9S-0006c9-68 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:31:54 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U4G9R-0006c0-LC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:31:53 +0000 Received: from smtpout3.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.59] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U4G9P-0002Gp-PY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:31:52 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.47.20]) by mwinf5d41 with ME id yKXX1k00D0S7kCq03KXXqK; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:31:31 +0100 Message-ID: <43D5229E1A7F4158BF27A01B1FAF6E4D@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <5116977F.50108@npton.plus.com> <51169844.60906@psk31.plus.com> <511699B8.4000208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51169C65.2060800@psk31.plus.com> <5116A1E6.5040806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <5116A1E6.5040806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 19:31:31 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Did some one mention Opera ? From: "Stefan Schäfer" Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 7:22 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: WSPR Test [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.59 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: b77892ad90d0261eaf071f4f6cf31464 Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: WSPR Test Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40ca5116b3e4535d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Did some one mention Opera ? -------------------------------------------------- From: "Stefan Schäfer" Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 7:22 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: WSPR Test > > Am 09.02.2013 19:58, schrieb g3zjo: >> No time reference just very accurate PIC timing which is good for weeks. > > Ah yes. BTW when using e.g. a netbook in /p WSPR tests it is totally > sufficient to sync the PC clock manually to your wrist watch (which was > synced at home), if necessary. So it is not really a pro-argument for > Opera that no timing is required. I've recently tested that at home with > my own transmissions... > >> PA, yes tiny by your standards, but it is the PA that has been growing >> recently. > :-) > >>> Pictures please! >> Oh dear do you really like rats nests? > ...and dirty fingers, yes ;-) > > 73, Stefan > >> >> Eddie >