Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E3D3A38000142; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:37:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U7Ths-000527-C9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:36:44 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U7Thr-00051y-UA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:36:43 +0000 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U7Thq-0000um-3b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:36:42 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.29.11]) by mwinf5d30 with ME id 1scL1l01k0EPDVe03scLY9; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:36:21 +0100 Message-ID: <230D4A440C6C43EAAD13E1A55224CC11@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <2282795.WEYH53gDWV@fbox.localdomain><0739D17A209E4085947C84C3590A8B5F@F6CNIHP><511FFC06.3090906@psk31.plus.com><0537FE7E5A0C4521A4BC62EF690FA911@Black><51215C1C.80906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de><51215C84.6030002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:36:20 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I have a better idea If the gang down under, now the undisputed wspr DX's migrate to the top of the band , then others will surely follow Then changing mode and running data can be done without retuning the Ae and leaves the middle of the band clearer for other more abstract past times like slow ssb or other such things [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 0317e2ac8ed27149e57223a21580246d Subject: Re: LF: Plans for 630m RX-TX experiments from EU to VK and VK to EU Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608b512258e6589f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none I have a better idea If the gang down under, now the undisputed wspr DX's migrate to the top of the band , then others will surely follow Then changing mode and running data can be done without retuning the Ae and leaves the middle of the band clearer for other more abstract past times like slow ssb or other such things G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Dimitrios Tsifakis" Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 11:25 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Plans for 630m RX-TX experiments from EU to VK and VK to EU > Hi Stefan, > > when I said "we" in my previous email, I was referring to VK amateurs. > That makes "you" the European amateurs. :-) > > I don't have any suggestions. I will give it a bit of thought, and > consult with the other VK stations and get back to you. > > 73, Dimtris > > > 2013/2/18 Stefan Schäfer : >> Same message, updated subject. >> >> Am 17.02.2013 23:39, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: >> >> Hi Dimitris, >> >> Thanks for the informations. >> Well, if 475.7 kHz is not a good choice due to QRM in VK, then "we" >> should >> discuss where to go. >> >> "We", that must be explained. I think that "we" are those active stations >> who either want to try to receive a station from VK or want to try to get >> a >> decode in VK. >> >> Of course i would like to join those active TX stations on MF and i like >> to >> try if i can leave a trace or decode, not only in the sand :-) I thought >> about running QRSS-10 near 476.170 kHz, as done in the last months. This >> would allow me to run the TX during the complete possible time, arround >> 15:30...18:00. Or, alternatively, i would like to run WSPR-2 in 100% TX >> mode. That would at least require splitted RX and TX bands on both sides, >> otherwise there will be complaints. There will be complaints anyway, im >> afraid... >> >> So maybe it would be an idea to define a special slot just for this path >> and >> time and active (RX and TX) stations so they can all run WSPR-2 in 100% >> mode. Of course there must be stations who are RXing exclusively but >> there >> are only a few who will TX anyway. >> >> Any recommendations / ideas? Should we discuss in direct emails including >> all those from VK who are not member of this group? >> >> I would start the MF experiment tomorrow. >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >