Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2DE6838000096; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 03:35:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U3jPi-0007qT-7R for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:34:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U3jPh-0007qK-Kz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:34:29 +0000 Received: from nm22-vm2.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.109.252]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U3jPf-00034U-TA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:34:28 +0000 Received: from [77.238.189.57] by nm22.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Feb 2013 08:34:06 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.252] by tm10.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Feb 2013 08:34:06 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1017.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Feb 2013 08:34:06 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 730205.20850.bm@omp1017.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 90934 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Feb 2013 08:34:06 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1360312446; bh=FkPUPlHkdC/p2W/+MoI09NkryVEKyYRNkrormtOh9ts=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DZiScxhhjOSKw7BK05/Rq24pEmnElkIfwDqiGpiECIakPbop0C6tMrjYMbhX+WUZRoouU4tXjjXl+P8L3glRyAr7jGWEYbYz7DR0V60SGACfmMJJf5dj4pXuRC099ATlXFD5H7p+/gw3jd8NKZLqdKqOk2GQaZgbzUTUNBPi538= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JeCI16oSJv0iXJrQmHPj7hg4ZOVEVg5xUN+6GmaA+1/F4IAywDFhDj8Zom8JuRte0QhXw7jZhlbdvze/z9Z+zYmOYLuA50XF5D5sskvDDvBtByJ3LDs24mb7jfeay+7kCqtHpQz2U3JrUZMNBEmB85YTbYuJ7Q0Zq7eg7x/vEBc=; X-YMail-OSG: Xo1MFywVM1m5YqKojKdVMIEXq.TRDck2SoEZbHJMpv5feCM phn_ks09KKZhbl3r6djhZmDCET8N4oZBK43Lmra4WEuAixN2JJdlHGCoEP.c JDes6mYp0HVQ2zWDb0jxLlNeLsfAYP4QxZV8ohode7SQur3BYMA.MdA.UrTd QcXMCTYpo4HaWH0nbvxjyOuzNW5VjRJefrzPlOX.y.6D49pOFNbY6a1vkMV. _bR9db41EHSFhlRv5Ny84fH0U6Xs13TZimqZ9JIRX8D8VrM12_6e5TSaEj7Q u3l67tACx3VbDX8rCkKvxV9_HPmVCQkULVkTwvETJsv4MMLyqdTXJ2VvLtzl yoHgiZ1BDXu6gH2tGXAvb0Pd_t_xlKsQNS3xguCmujKa7VvSm72V22VT0DMT fLStlR0GYYR6t9Q15E1dKsABN2ehoB766ug4kE4JPNauZwGBW_nhKzTSyXS6 W7IDKNEoOcaJ93JeyyjyzhW_x2sZL6fCcYhsizPp9yWg1mgXIV2g- Received: from [81.129.249.231] by web133202.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:34:06 GMT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,Qm9ua2VycyEKCsKgCjczIGVzIEdMIFBldGUgTTBGTVQgSU85MVVYCgoKPl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fCj4gRnJvbTogInRyYXVtd2FuZGxlckBzZW5zZW1haWwuY2giIDx0cmF1bXdhbmRsZXJAc2Vuc2VtYWlsLmNoPgo.VG86IHJzZ2JfbGZfZ3JvdXBAYmxhY2tzaGVlcC5vcmcgCj5TZW50OiBGcmlkYXksIDggRmVicnVhcnkgMjAxMywgODoyNAo.U3ViamVjdDogTEY6IE5SUkwgcHJvcG9zYWwgZm9yIGEgNjMwbSBCYW5kIFBsYW4KPiAgCj5BcmUgeW91IGF3YXJlIG9mIHRoaXMgcHIBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.132.503 References: <33a081ba8fa54d99adcf8022fbb0c07b@kabelmail.de> <981c2fdebe29e7ff448a2bfb7bf53238@sensemail.ch> Message-ID: <1360312446.81440.YahooMailNeo@web133202.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:34:06 +0000 (GMT) From: M0FMT To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <981c2fdebe29e7ff448a2bfb7bf53238@sensemail.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Bonkers!  73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX > > From: "traumwandler@sensemail.ch" >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Sent: Friday, 8 February 2013, 8:24 >Subject: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan > >Are you aware of this proposal? >What do you think about it? >73 de Toni, HB9ASB > > >Recommendation >From the viewpoints of NRRL we would (at the time being) like to present the >following proposal for a 630 m IARU Region 1 bandplan: >472 - 479 kHz (630 m) >472 - 475 kHz CW only – maximum bandwidth 200 Hz >  472.000 - 472.150 CW Beacons only (IARU coordinated) >  472.150 - 472.300 CW QRSS >  472.600          CW DX Calling >  474.750          CW Calling >475 - 479 kHz CW + digimodes – maximum bandwidth 500 Hz >Contests should be discouraged in this very narrow 630 m band where radio >amateurs are secondary users. >Comment: >NRRL feels that it will be premature to further subdivide different digimodes. This >may be better to do at the next conference, if necessary, after considering >experiences. > > > > > > > > > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.109.252 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (m0fmt[at]yahoo.co.uk) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 8556389a5ea14fbbf9b9d801ab70c592 Subject: Re: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-745693771-946870370-1360312446=:81440" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-dg06.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : yahoo.co.uk DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410e5114b8c973ec X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ---745693771-946870370-1360312446=:81440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bonkers!=0A=0A=C2=A0=0A73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX=0A=0A=0A>________________= ________________=0A> From: "traumwandler@sensemail.ch" =0A>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org =0A>Sent: Friday, 8 February 20= 13, 8:24=0A>Subject: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan=0A> =0A>Are yo= u aware of this proposal?=0A>What do you think about it?=0A>73 de Toni, HB9= ASB=0A>=0A>=0A>Recommendation=0A>From the viewpoints of NRRL we would (at t= he time being) like to present the=0A>following proposal for a 630 m IARU R= egion 1 bandplan:=0A>472 - 479 kHz (630 m)=0A>472 - 475 kHz=C2=A0 CW only = =E2=80=93 maximum bandwidth 200 Hz=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 472.000 - 472.150=C2=A0= CW Beacons only (IARU coordinated)=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 472.150 - 472.300=C2= =A0 CW QRSS=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 472.600=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 CW DX Calling=0A>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 474.750=C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 CW Call= ing=0A>475 - 479 kHz=C2=A0 CW + digimodes =E2=80=93 maximum bandwidth 500 H= z=0A>Contests should be discouraged in this very narrow 630 m band where ra= dio=0A>amateurs are secondary users.=0A>Comment:=0A>NRRL feels that it will= be premature to further subdivide different digimodes. This=0A>may be bett= er to do at the next conference, if necessary, after considering=0A>experie= nces.=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A> ---745693771-946870370-1360312446=:81440 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bonkers!

 
73 es GL Pete M0F= MT IO91UX
From: "traumwandler@sensemail.ch" <t= raumwandler@sensemail.ch>
To:<= /span> rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Se= nt: Friday, 8 February 2013, 8:24
Subject: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan
=

Are you aware of this proposal?
What do you think abo= ut it?
73 de Toni, HB9ASB


Recommendation
From the viewpoin= ts of NRRL we would (at the time being) like to present the
following pr= oposal for a 630 m IARU Region 1 bandplan:
472 - 479 kHz (630 m)
472 = - 475 kHz  CW only =E2=80=93 maximum bandwidth 200 Hz
   = 472.000 - 472.150  CW Beacons only (IARU coordinated)
   = ; 472.150 - 472.300  CW QRSS
    472.600    &nb= sp;               CW DX Calling
&nbs= p;   474.750                &n= bsp;   CW Calling
475 - 479 kHz  CW + digimodes =E2=80=93 max= imum bandwidth 500 Hz
Contests should be discouraged in this very narrow 630= m band where radio
amateurs are secondary users.
Comment:
NRRL fe= els that it will be premature to further subdivide different digimodes. Thi= s
may be better to do at the next conference, if necessary, after consid= ering
experiences.








---745693771-946870370-1360312446=:81440--