Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9532738000088; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:33:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U7Owh-0002lO-N2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:31:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U7Owh-0002lF-46 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:31:43 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U7Owf-00089b-3a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:31:41 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgIFALcPIlFcF/Zj/2dsb2JhbABFwCGBAxdzghoFAQEFCAEBA0kCDx0BAQMFAgEDEQQBAQolFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBiAW/Oo5YVBiDOgOIMYVZmHqDBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,686,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="409331094" Received: from host-92-23-246-99.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.246.99]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 18 Feb 2013 11:31:19 +0000 Message-ID: <015801ce0dcb$77b16640$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <00df01ce0dba$13ecb080$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <51220AE0.8060106@psk31.plus.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:31:17 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes I did decode you at the same time. I have noticed many times although I get decodes they do not always appear on the web DB, others have noticed the same, something to do with the Internet speed at the time. If you are throwing doubt about the validy of this decode then treat the others also as suspect !! You cannot pick and choose. I cannot recall getting false/corrupt decodes, its seems to be all or nothing. It seems odd that it was CX2 a genuine call prefix why was it not CB, CZ , CY, C31, CL7 etc then it would raise some suspicion. You are now guessing that it was WG2XCT is WSPR a guessamode if you do not like what you see guess what it might be!! I have an open mind about such events but MIRACLES seems to be the flavour of the month, I am just carried along with the flow !! [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 2b323379b582abbe78ea971e119c2a1c Subject: Re: LF: WSPR DX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0155_01CE0DCB.7756C320" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4095122116c38fb X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0155_01CE0DCB.7756C320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes I did decode you at the same time. I have noticed many times although I = get decodes they do not always appear on the web DB, others have noticed = the same, something to do with the Internet speed at the time. If you are throwing doubt about the validy of this decode then treat the = others also as suspect !! You cannot pick and choose. I cannot recall getting false/corrupt decodes, its seems to be all or = nothing. It seems odd that it was CX2 a genuine call prefix why was it = not CB, CZ , CY, C31, CL7 etc then it would raise some suspicion. You are now guessing that it was WG2XCT ---------- is WSPR a guessamode = if you do not like what you see guess what it might be!! I have an open mind about such events but MIRACLES seems to be the = flavour of the month, I am just carried along with the flow !! g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: g3zjo=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 11:05 AM Subject: Re: LF: WSPR DX Hi Mal On 18/02/2013 09:26, mal hamilton wrote:=20 MF Some good DX about this past couple of days this morning 0916 -25 1.4 0.475745 2 CX4DVF 13 Well at least the system wasn't stupid enough to think it was a valid = decode and add it to the database. There really aren't that many false decodes if the RX signal is free = of spurii. May be it was a mix of my enormous signal, you received me at = that time, with a sprog at your end. Or maybe you shouldn't be getting sarcastic maybe you should be = getting excited. VK2DAG transmitted at that time. More likely though with the coincidence of characters in the Call and = the QRG it could have been WG2XCT also co timed. This must indeed be a MIRACLE mode Its not doing bad at all lately is it. Eddie de G3KEV ------=_NextPart_000_0155_01CE0DCB.7756C320 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes
I did decode you at the same time. I have = noticed many=20 times although I get decodes they do not always appear on the web = DB,=20 others have noticed the same, something to do with the Internet speed at = the=20 time.
If you are throwing doubt about the validy of = this decode=20 then treat the others also as suspect !! You cannot pick and=20 choose.
I cannot recall getting false/corrupt decodes, = its seems=20 to be all or nothing. It seems odd that it was CX2 a genuine call = prefix=20 why was it not CB, CZ , CY, C31, CL7  etc then it = would=20 raise some suspicion.
You are now guessing that it was WG2XCT = ---------- is WSPR=20 a guessamode if you do not like what you see guess what it might=20 be!!
I have an open mind about such events but = MIRACLES seems=20 to be the flavour of the month,  I am just carried along with the = flow=20 !!
 
g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 g3zjo=20
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 = 11:05=20 AM
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR DX

Hi Mal

On 18/02/2013 09:26, mal hamilton wrote:=20
MF
Some good DX about this past couple of=20 days
this morning
0916 -25 1.4 0.475745 2 CX4DVF=20 13
Well at least the system wasn't stupid = enough to=20 think it was a valid decode and add it to the database.

There = really=20 aren't that many false decodes if the RX signal is free of spurii. May = be it=20 was a mix of my enormous signal, you received me at that time, with a = sprog at=20 your end.

Or maybe you shouldn't be getting sarcastic maybe you = should=20 be getting excited. VK2DAG transmitted at that time.

More = likely though=20 with the coincidence of characters in the  Call and the QRG it = could have=20 been WG2XCT also co timed.

 
This must indeed be a MIRACLE = mode
 
Its not doing bad at all lately is=20 it.

Eddie
de G3KEV
 

------=_NextPart_000_0155_01CE0DCB.7756C320--