Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 62B343800019D; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 13:14:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U1L6z-0007nc-TQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:13:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U1L6z-0007nT-HI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:13:17 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U1L6x-000114-AX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:13:16 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYOAOMDDFFcHYG6/2dsb2JhbABFg2ejXQOPdoZqBIEBF3OCGRQBAQNJAiwCCAIBBgECGzkBBBoGJB0BAgIBAYgEoWahNY07DBuDbAOIMIVVmGKCfA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,579,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="417827477" Received: from host-92-29-129-186.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.29.129.186]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 01 Feb 2013 18:12:54 +0000 Message-ID: <00bd01ce00a7$be930e50$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: "rsgb" Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 18:12:48 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: What is the point of jumping around in frequency and taking up even more bandwidth?? when the signal is perfectly readable on one freq g3kev What is the point of jumping around in frequency and taking up even more bandwidth?? when the signal is perfectly readable on one freq [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.9 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120 Subject: LF: WSPR Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00BA_01CE00A7.BDFCE8D0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6187510c05f2430b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00BA_01CE00A7.BDFCE8D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What is the point of jumping around in frequency and taking up even more = bandwidth?? when the signal is perfectly readable on one freq g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_00BA_01CE00A7.BDFCE8D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What is the point of jumping around in frequency = and=20 taking up even more bandwidth?? when the signal is perfectly readable on = one=20 freq
g3kev
 
------=_NextPart_000_00BA_01CE00A7.BDFCE8D0--