Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 64A3B380000B7; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 13:10:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U1L2n-0007gK-9q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:08:57 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U1L2m-0007gB-Tl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:08:56 +0000 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U1L2l-0000yX-En for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:08:55 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYOAM70C1FcHYG6/2dsb2JhbABFg2ejXQOPdoZqBIEBF3OCFQQUAQEDSQIsAggCAQYBHTkBBBoGJB0BAgIBAYgEoWahNY07DBuDbAOIMIVVmGKCfA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,579,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="564580725" Received: from host-92-29-129-186.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.29.129.186]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 01 Feb 2013 18:08:33 +0000 Message-ID: <00ae01ce00a7$23040ed0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: "rsgb" Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 18:08:28 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: So far no one seems to be reporting WSPR acty. Am I the only one receiving all these signals. I am not attempting to decode because would prefer if these sigs were on CW or QRSS cetainly not efficient as regards bandwidth de g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.9 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 046f068074e745d5c60ca47deee9b503 Subject: LF: WSPR on MF Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AB_01CE00A7.22A721C0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600b510c04fd330a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00AB_01CE00A7.22A721C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So far no one seems to be reporting WSPR acty. Am I the only one = receiving all these signals. I am not attempting to decode because would = prefer if these sigs were on CW or QRSS cetainly not efficient as = regards bandwidth de g3kev ------=_NextPart_000_00AB_01CE00A7.22A721C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
So far no one seems to be reporting WSPR acty. = Am I the=20 only one receiving all these signals. I am not attempting to decode = because=20 would prefer if these sigs were on CW or QRSS cetainly not efficient as = regards=20 bandwidth
de g3kev
 
------=_NextPart_000_00AB_01CE00A7.22A721C0--