Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 18583380000AC; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:37:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U77Dr-0004iA-Tk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:36:15 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U77Dr-0004i1-Gc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:36:15 +0000 Received: from out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U77Dp-0004S3-Qq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:36:14 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al8GAED7IFFcE7tU/2dsb2JhbABEinS1KX0Xc4IaBQEBBQgBAQMlASMCLAEBAwUCAQMRBAEBCiUUAQQaBhYIBhMKAQICAQGIBb1gjlhsEIMqA44KmHqDBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,682,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="62981362" Received: from host-92-19-187-84.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.19.187.84]) by out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 17 Feb 2013 16:35:53 +0000 Message-ID: <005101ce0d2c$d9737e30$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <5120F58D.8040001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <004101ce0d23$3acf8ca0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <5120F95F.5010609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5120FDB4.3040802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <512104DD.70107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:35:51 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan I am now CQ surprised u cannot hear me kk g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 4:27 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: CW beacon on LF [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 3f8d74a8c70dd416d0a3a1dbcb9bb89f Subject: Re: LF: Re: CW beacon on LF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d55121074a1ac6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan I am now CQ surprised u cannot hear me kk g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 4:27 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: CW beacon on LF Hi Andy, thanks for the nice report :-) So this would be suitable for a QSO i think :-) However there were no audible (or visible) signals on 136.5 during the time i called CQ. Now back to beacon transmissions for the eventual newcomers Good luck for a new VK detection. Now it's the time, so hurry to go back to MF :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 17.02.2013 17:12, schrieb André Guyé: > Stefan, > > switching from 474.2 to 136.5 CW. you just finish your CQ. 599 +++ > here. The beverage is in your direction ! Noise is S2. > > Andy; > > -----Message d'origine----- From: Stefan Schäfer > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 4:56 PM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Re: CW beacon on LF > > PS: Certainly a QSO is no problem if you have a suitable TX/ANTENNA so i > can hear you. > > 73, Stefan > >> >> Am 17.02.2013 16:26, schrieb mal hamilton: >>> Stefan >>> I can fire up for a QSO if you have a suitable RX/ANTENNA to hear me >>> de mal/g3kev >>> > >