Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BAF2138000089; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 03:51:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tr2yb-000183-58 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 08:50:05 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tr2ya-00017u-GU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 08:50:04 +0000 Received: from nm3-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.108.88]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tr2yY-0007PH-DO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 08:50:03 +0000 Received: from [212.82.108.228] by nm3.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2013 08:49:41 -0000 Received: from [217.146.189.247] by tm1.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2013 08:49:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp820.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan 2013 08:49:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1357289381; bh=Cw4oFjDpga/zZoH624W5QFiJyRuEOgaqOteljDSV9ag=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE; b=wuEAgotg9Vv5JWkN6fw10RXwzYNMdTA8tMxhHkzmMsijhGvi8ZFSZ8x0e/2yijj2ThvbCdRFnhB1Vc3tIx8RIybz8atwaP0j/lwdSvcwYFEdRfsJQp1ozmiU/qUuiS2syDn0D3XSaN4dQwIEZcCqsQ/frhJ+XV6GS22DRu4+r64= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 352524.22665.bm@smtp820.mail.ird.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: kbQE6EoVM1kHSuizVbJBMI.SDxWERsHXZJJ2BBFj.RL34mo LieLYiVcK3TPrnkz76yAO3VMT1eY1.kan8qWeTBW6oG_K7jg71H5m0FPmsA3 ilIlZNDZgkG_PCD.0hRCdMPDshk6ZJ.eGwSX3T8mNAQBhieQTmEzv4SoCWnY 9T4pGCmLMjjM3hYHoSodsiaJZN0BHGFuTt2y6ObPQ7MhOP659xVVyFmTWn2d kGTJ59j5OdKc2nYarRPShO7P_7.5G4gt2FLPRMjTCJ2KTjo7qz.4o2Wqx64v 2ybCEGRbcPsEQTvmkSKwtxLaoWBwFJQ_cKwN19Ay73NXAlNLHZcnmB0hV5Zp ReDYUV0NAY1A.IJvM.75vvegpxruuoSiT78SziwDePlqsyCAl.XgSyi9dxKz wmI3_dqGLyzafbFmTfeQAjUQfxrg.dhwFWRXvWgDmq1pGjU8mdmASYKh6k9g 9bVdEkRiY6R15RZ2i3_TXiwX0WHSA0EbeodN9eQKRbSQF6DO17Q3p0clefwM - X-Yahoo-SMTP: .u8e2g.swBByWKjbpA3lR6Fw.2ZEQrJJpVsTSrpXLCffsPaCEMY- Received: from IBM7FFA209F07C (c.ashby435@31.51.128.30 with login) by smtp820.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 04 Jan 2013 08:49:41 +0000 GMT Message-ID: From: "Chris" To: References: Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 08:49:43 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Colin, Not too sure what you're getting at. We all have our individual interests. I hope you're not suggesting the new band should only be used by obsessive DX CW only enthusiasts? Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message ----- From: M5FRA - Colin To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 8:24 AM Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.108.88 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: 732f75eee0c2d2fe842e0fb4d553dbc4 Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0079_01CDEA58.71009E60" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-de06.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40ce50e697fd1a7d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0079_01CDEA58.71009E60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Colin, Not too sure what you're getting at. We all have our individual = interests. I hope you're not suggesting the new band should only be used = by obsessive DX CW only enthusiasts? Chris, G4AYT. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: M5FRA - Colin=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 8:24 AM Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local SSB chat band ? Just a thought.....when it gets totally washed out with SSB all 24 = hours how are you going to clean it out? People in general dont follow = gentlemen's agreements they were not party too.....and "it doesnt say I = cant in the licence".=20 I fear that, though what you suggest would work, it might encourage = mayhem. I agree with Alan. What is wrong with top band for local chats? Or the = acres of unused space on 2m or 70cms? To consider using any form of SSB = on 630m just because it might be technically feasible if sheer lunacy. = IMHO it would kill the band for other modes and the potential for QRM to = other users will be high. As an ex G8 who learned Morse in spite of a = chronic medical condition I would say just get on a do it. The rewards = are well worth the effort. Or maybe effort is a dirty word? Colin - G8FRA/M5FRA m5fra.org.uk ------=_NextPart_000_0079_01CDEA58.71009E60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Hi Colin,
Not too sure what you're getting at. We = all have=20 our individual interests. I hope you're not suggesting the new band = should only=20 be used by obsessive DX CW only enthusiasts?
Chris, G4AYT.
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 M5FRA -=20 Colin
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 = 8:24=20 AM
Subject: Re: LF: 477 A local = SSB chat=20 band ?

Just a thought.....when it gets totally washed out with = SSB all 24=20 hours how are you going to clean it out? People in general dont follow = gentlemen's agreements they were not party too.....and "it doesnt say = I cant=20 in the licence".
I fear that, though = what you=20 suggest would work, it might encourage = mayhem.

I agree with Alan. What is wrong with top band for local chats? = Or the=20 acres of unused space on 2m or 70cms? To consider using any form = of SSB=20 on 630m just because it might be technically feasible if sheer lunacy. = IMHO it=20 would kill the band for other modes and the potential for QRM to other = users=20 will be high.  As an ex G8 who learned Morse in spite of a = chronic=20 medical condition I would say just get on a do it. The rewards are = well worth=20 the effort. Or maybe effort is a dirty word?
 
Colin - G8FRA/M5FRA
 
m5fra.org.uk

------=_NextPart_000_0079_01CDEA58.71009E60--