Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EE561380000AC; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:16:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U11TN-0003kF-IF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:15:05 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U11TM-0003k6-PD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:15:04 +0000 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U11TH-0007Q3-Av for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:15:03 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id o1so17266wic.5 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:14:38 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer :in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=K11O9Ynf+qfkzFZB7S/49DH6uTxsoRi94Iye9f6vG4U=; b=elpGMsqwKXHBrYM/Tmlj35MBS1FNxsy9H1wVJAkSZSo0EfynfgYeG9nnZV7zt8PFs1 wPthzCLSSsrTsFNUHIbAFWiHhxoVNaoUuTf9jkHqRu/8X4DDyiqdzFy2aNkX478gGOPb a8Ia/9e2UnQyDdTUk2dg/fRhY864XSOclKuU1ElPwVzY0BfhzHBFBPi3OTdOPL4h8jEs 6zKZ5dnINdTmmA6lGPWEQLngw0L3UofPhl+cw80fYW+jTOcS7TmcrrDtGTYRWvsgegLT DL4gpC7G9eOE6S5JYSkJAIz5lBxwzuTsVHN831KfObR0fIvo2ugHk/tGIgWW3lK9FjXP F5Ww== X-Received: by 10.180.73.80 with SMTP id j16mr17479036wiv.5.1359666878632; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:14:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (cpc4-cmbg17-2-0-cust740.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com. [86.14.226.229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fx5sm11857931wib.11.2013.01.31.13.14.36 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:14:37 -0800 (PST) References: <510A94C5.2000001@psk31.plus.com> From: Roger Lapthorn X-Mailer: iPod Mail (10A523) In-Reply-To: <510A94C5.2000001@psk31.plus.com> Message-Id: Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:14:34 +0000 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Good work Eddie! 73s Roger G3XBM On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:59, g3zjo wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.212.178 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: c8ff00257edaad8e124ab9389da9609a Subject: Re: LF: QRPpp on 474KHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-83F8E787-8D8C-413B-AE3F-4B929D91E13E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-da01.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4049510adf162407 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --Apple-Mail-83F8E787-8D8C-413B-AE3F-4B929D91E13E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good work Eddie! 73s Roger G3XBM=20 On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:59, g3zjo wrote: > LF >=20 > The change from 500KHz to 472KHz rendered a few mini Xtal controlled TX mo= dules once used on 500 redundant so I have changed them to DDS control. >=20 > I have run the 200uW TX again which gave me my first spot on 500kHz in 200= 09 :- >=20 > 2009-11-22 00:48 G3ZJO 0.503814 -30 0 IO92ng +17 0.050 M0BMU IO91vr 76 47 >=20 > Since that first report I have made antenna improvements so assuming no ch= anges at M0BMU these should be reflected in the report from that rig. >=20 > 2013-01-28 00:50 G3ZJO 0.475790 -18 0 IO92ng +0 0.001 M0BMU IO91vr 76 4= 7 >=20 > Last night I ran a different mixer/driver to the same PA still 200uW EIRP w= ith very much the same results. >=20 > 2013-01-30 00:30 G3ZJO 0.475612 -21 0 IO92ng +0 0.001 M0BMU IO91vr 76= 47=20 >=20 > Today I completed the change of my very first test TX into a buffer, this T= X could never produce enough signal into my first antenna experiments for a d= ecode. I measured the power into a 50R load it is 10dB down on the above TX s= o 20uW EIRP. I tried it as the PA. >=20 > 2013-01-31 14:46 G3ZJO 0.475601 -30 0 IO92ng +0 0.001 M0BMU IO91vr 7= 6 47=20 >=20 > After 4 transmissions (only 8 minutes on air) my best DX is 100Km. >=20 > 2013-01-31 14:56 G3ZJO 0.475602 -29 0 IO92ng +0 0.001 G3SZS IO81vv 1= 00 62 >=20 > If I was calling CQ on the key I estimate 8000 Years before I got any repo= rt AT ALL then it would most likely be meaningless 599 :-)=20 >=20 > Unfortunately the power levels shown by the WSPR reports are not correct a= nd must be disregarded. Tests will continue at 20 micro Watts EIRP for this e= vening. >=20 > 73 Eddie >=20 --Apple-Mail-83F8E787-8D8C-413B-AE3F-4B929D91E13E Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Good work Eddie!

73s
Roger G3XBM 

On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:59, g3zjo <g3zjo@psk31.plus.com> wrote:

LF

The change from 500KHz to 472KHz rendered a few mini Xtal controlled TX modules once used on 500 redundant so I have changed them to DDS control.

I have run the 200uW TX again which gave me my first spot on 500kHz in 20009 :-

2009-11-22 00:48 G3ZJO 0.503814 -30 0 IO92ng +17 0.050 M0BMU IO91vr 76 47

Since that first report I have made antenna improvements so assuming no changes at M0BMU these should be reflected in the report from that rig.

2013-01-28 00:50 G3ZJO 0.475790  -18  0 IO92ng +0  0.001 M0BMU  IO91vr 76 47

Last night I ran a different mixer/driver to the same PA still 200uW EIRP with very much the same results.

2013-01-30 00:30 G3ZJO 0.475612   -21  0 IO92ng +0  0.001 M0BMU  IO91vr 76 47

Today I completed the change of my very first test TX into a buffer, this TX could never produce enough signal into my first antenna experiments for a decode. I measured the power into a 50R load it is 10dB down on the above TX so 20uW EIRP. I tried it as the PA.

2013-01-31 14:46 G3ZJO 0.475601    -30  0 IO92ng  +0  0.001 M0BMU IO91vr 76  47

After 4 transmissions (only 8 minutes on air) my best DX is 100Km.

2013-01-31 14:56 G3ZJO 0.475602    -29  0 IO92ng +0  0.001  G3SZS  IO81vv 100 62

If I was calling CQ on the key I estimate 8000 Years before I got any report AT ALL then it would most likely be meaningless 599 :-)

Unfortunately the power levels shown by the WSPR reports are not correct and must be disregarded. Tests will continue at 20 micro Watts EIRP for this evening.

73 Eddie

--Apple-Mail-83F8E787-8D8C-413B-AE3F-4B929D91E13E--