Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 395F0380000A3; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 12:40:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TuRWu-0001dD-2f for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:39:32 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TuRWt-0001d4-Gx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:39:31 +0000 Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com ([209.85.216.47]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TuRWq-0001zA-KQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:39:30 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a19so948155qad.13 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:39:07 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=XeMIp57gfp95rv4SA/0eq95HybFB4Qz3iF7O4fc4JBs=; b=nWbwgiJO/uev/NdCTLM4OkvofM9y1YAoC4j3VTcmZzztxxhRvqoV/oN0bvAVNfCvEp ROr30R2OrxSGJX1nutdIBVEYtVIgoAFdEebPwi1JY0eI1mbNA0pVLa/HCtcaUePojZWv m/d+8B/k0hGdn5oxbRyKlLsQEUS0rkGDxpr2xWgdiP851KIXlK6jgUdYNsEBfSkNTz1B j0ysAdNnSU6sKNha0uEqr0a6orpV6uLfIujsHEqBgbZMeUY195hrqGaDJYBR+bPt5sTF +PXaADoD7WvW/PnN32zUOPPrc8vSD1Bo/usnfB9SHx8tI+eVPhSHjbCH9lO/jEcfKtJh 4Hrw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.108.9 with SMTP id hg9mr79381905qeb.34.1358098746766; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:39:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.156.18 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 09:39:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50F1BA15.9080005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <50F1A85E.1030904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50F1BA15.9080005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:39:06 +0000 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, Here I was copying you on 136kHz WSPR last night with an untuned antenna and a deaf FT817. PA0A had his set-up showing the wrong band for a time, so maybe it was one of his spots of me you saw on 136kHz TX? I hope to be WSPRing and JT9 active on 136kHz by the end of the week, on the earth electrode antenna, when a new 136kHz version of my MF 10W transverter is ready. From previous experience, this is a LOT harder than 472kHz with small/compromise antennas at this power level. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.216.47 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: ab7de7439a3fce0b74220375dc6f18e8 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bea3b445ef56004d32f018b X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mk01.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618550f2f19f1e40 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --047d7bea3b445ef56004d32f018b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan, Here I was copying you on 136kHz WSPR last night with an untuned antenna and a deaf FT817. PA0A had his set-up showing the wrong band for a time, so maybe it was one of his spots of me you saw on 136kHz TX? I hope to be WSPRing and JT9 active on 136kHz by the end of the week, on the earth electrode antenna, when a new 136kHz version of my MF 10W transverter is ready. From previous experience, this is a LOT harder than 472kHz with small/compromise antennas at this power level. Have just checked that my current WSPR settings are correctly on 474.2kHz. At the moment I am using my "10m halo feeder" as a 6m long Marconi. In the week I am rigging up a coax so I can run the earth-electrode antenna from the upstairs shack with the transverter in the back of the garage at the feed point to the earth-electrode antenna. Another local G4HJW is experimenting with a 30m spaced earth-electrode antenna on 472kHz WSPR and getting quite decent results - he is also seeing loop-like directionality. Another local G4KPX is using 1W RF into a 1m diameter loop indoors and getting reports from decent distances. He is a good signal with me. Amazing. His ERP is a lot less than 100uW. You may remember that I have copied both you and G3XIZ on the earth-electrode antenna on 8.97kHz. I think DJ8WX and one of the Austrians was copied on 8.97kHz on my 80m sq loop when this was up. 73s Roger G3XBM On 12 January 2013 19:31, Stefan Sch=E4fer < Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote: > > Am 12.01.2013 20:06, schrieb Roger Lapthorn: > >> [...] >> >> BTW, thank you for your recent 472kHz WSPR spots. >> >> 73s >> Roger G3XBM >> > > No problem ;-) > > BTW, you're showing on the LF WSPR activity map. Is this correct or did > you forget to switch the band in the WSPR software? Are you receiving wit= h > the earth loop? Right now i'm WSPRing on LF in 33% mode. If you like, giv= e > it a try, RX wise... > > 73, Stefan > > --=20 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM --047d7bea3b445ef56004d32f018b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Stefan,

Here I wa= s copying you on 136kHz WSPR last night with an untuned antenna and a deaf = FT817.=A0 PA0A had his set-up showing the wrong band for a time, so maybe i= t was one of his spots of me you saw on 136kHz TX?=A0 I hope to be WSPRing = and JT9 active on 136kHz by the end of the week, on the earth electrode antenna, when a new 136kHz version of my MF 10W=20 transverter is ready. From previous experience, this is a LOT harder=20 than 472kHz with small/compromise antennas at this power level.

Have= just checked that my current WSPR settings are correctly on 474.2kHz. At t= he moment I am using my "10m halo feeder" as a 6m long Marconi. I= n the week I am rigging up a coax so I can run the earth-electrode antenna = from the upstairs shack with the transverter in the back of the garage at t= he feed point to the earth-electrode antenna. Another local G4HJW is experi= menting with a 30m spaced earth-electrode antenna on 472kHz WSPR and gettin= g quite decent results - he is also seeing loop-like directionality. Anothe= r local G4KPX is using 1W RF into a 1m diameter loop indoors and getting re= ports from decent distances. He is a good signal with me. Amazing. His ERP = is a lot less than 100uW.

You may remember that I have copied both you and G3XIZ on the ear= th-electrode antenna on 8.97kHz. I think DJ8WX and one of the Austrians was= copied on 8.97kHz on my 80m sq loop when this was up.

73s
Roger G3XBM


On 12 January 2013 19:31, Stefan Sch=E4fer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote:

Am 12.01.2013 20:06, schrieb Roger Lapthorn:
[...]

BTW, thank you for your recent 472kHz WSPR spots.

73s
Roger G3XBM

No problem ;-)

BTW, you're showing on the LF WSPR activity map. Is this correct or did= you forget to switch the band in the WSPR software? Are you receiving with= the earth loop? Right now i'm WSPRing on LF in 33% mode. If you like, = give it a try, RX wise...

73, Stefan




--
--047d7bea3b445ef56004d32f018b--