Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8AA74380000EA; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:24:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TrYvP-000824-KS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:56:55 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TrYvP-00081v-6x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:56:55 +0000 Received: from mail-ia0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TrYvM-0005pG-Cz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:56:54 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u20so8457445iag.28 for ; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 10:56:30 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XJWMMZHBmwRZEXs0lFZ1S46LLPOe0q2Es9j/SsZvOTE=; b=YuxBUH1Txav9vcRwffm0nFdmtYPgfiV2/F1yobPmfbM01kKlX4QW+D7mteYxFKxNww VUOjkaeMiZ36ufY9punGBCCobJVTzAsxWhKdPIJfaGkn66fbsFajpFv1iGSEmbKP47jg lJ/Cj6o7ZMQoeluSeW0fQCPyjpJcjuOJWnRjRzvJscKJnRzRPhYGWFGTHlBUqr9eykE0 njoACpBbuYpt3QjEd6zDSnunLfL8nR1G3b0ql/C6lxGtsku8NLMmkFhYwMYgHqiT89bQ hPwazyLucfrqC+OFu0Hjo20y7w/Ua2cH3F9rZ9Vzx3M9J1cV7LaCxPh8FqVmA2ra5Toi 4WCQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.151.166 with SMTP id ur6mr2050044igb.66.1357412190402; Sat, 05 Jan 2013 10:56:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.63.193 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Jan 2013 10:56:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 18:56:30 +0000 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: After my first successful 2-way 472kHz JT9-1 QSO (5-10mW ERP each end) with G3ZJO earlier, I'm now calling CQ on JT9-1 with my signal about 75Hz below the bottom of the WSPR band. I shall be calling on and off for the next hour or so and would love a QSO or two. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 046f068074e745d5c60ca47deee9b503 Subject: LF: 472kHz JT9-1 - calling CQ now looking for QSOs Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f23549d6c367004d28f27c8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601750e87df1575b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --e89a8f23549d6c367004d28f27c8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 After my first successful 2-way 472kHz JT9-1 QSO (5-10mW ERP each end) with G3ZJO earlier, I'm now calling CQ on JT9-1 with my signal about 75Hz below the bottom of the WSPR band. I shall be calling on and off for the next hour or so and would love a QSO or two. 73s Roger G3XBM -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ --e89a8f23549d6c367004d28f27c8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
After my first successful 2-way 472kHz JT9-= 1 QSO (5-10mW ERP each end) with G3ZJO earlier, I'm now calling CQ on J= T9-1 with my signal about 75Hz below the bottom of the WSPR band.

I shall be calling on and off for the next hour or so and would love a QSO = or two.

73s
Roger G3XBM
--e89a8f23549d6c367004d28f27c8--