Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9B08A3800009D; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 06:54:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TronF-0004zH-6Z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 11:53:33 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TronE-0004z8-OL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 11:53:32 +0000 Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TronC-0000WJ-KZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 11:53:31 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id b14so10719353qcs.38 for ; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 03:53:08 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=z8iPuZfNVv/rQK2W68ZCPytOLMjJTLWl5Bcm9p2qT2E=; b=zP7oT+cLnkKGgGtHAdXEzC2zbqNQ5uqSTohMx+UaXt7PVGCBJKc66XQv6KZ2kDr+gp vMIhYRZJ8PxVQP7xNmdOmXBxp97cAt8Lg91dyHtc+L1y1CDLMUwayJ+CqDnMyfRNJhnA JtzXyUVcpAMHxkQVNUYOPQCBN4ec6r1lvPxW6Yu2Bqgk8zms0rK7s3kDaNr9Gi9Uk7Gh 43EHWmuI5/7VlI84a3J7EUZWiXZYOZljWYRckUhVIFBu5fg46O6J0enopePFSqcTw0Z2 0KaA8bDu0WoflyUw4i7YLkkG2hINCXkjVN2eTnsLOr7kl2aub7BdGIHDblPKBbwPiovx VhZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.96.33 with SMTP id dp1mr46223765qeb.60.1357473188583; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 03:53:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.156.18 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 03:53:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 11:53:08 +0000 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Later today I intend to transmit for several hours using my 20m spaced earth electrode "antenna" normally used on VLF. The wire between the 2 electrodes is at most 1.5m above ground and runs between the house and a ground stake at the bottom of our small back garden. Signal levels are likely to be down on those obtained with my 6m long (1/100 wavelength) vertical, but I am interested to know by how much. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.216.179 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 49f0f587e44d6711c57b8a4e950ba850 Subject: LF: Earth probe antenna tests on 472kHz WSPR Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6da40c32986f04d29d5b0a X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601850e965e816f1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --047d7b6da40c32986f04d29d5b0a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Later today I intend to transmit for several hours using my 20m spaced earth electrode "antenna" normally used on VLF. The wire between the 2 electrodes is at most 1.5m above ground and runs between the house and a ground stake at the bottom of our small back garden. Signal levels are likely to be down on those obtained with my 6m long (1/100 wavelength) vertical, but I am interested to know by how much. So, if you copy my WSPR signal later today at a lower level than usual, you know the reason. I expect to set up after lunch and start TXing around 1400gmt. WSPR reports on the earth probe antenna will be MUCH appreciated. 73s Roger G3XBM -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ --047d7b6da40c32986f04d29d5b0a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Later today I intend to transmit for s= everal hours using my 20m spaced earth electrode "antenna" normal= ly used on VLF. The wire between the 2 electrodes is at most 1.5m above gro= und and runs between the house and a ground stake at the bottom of our smal= l back garden. Signal levels are likely to be down on those obtained with m= y 6m long (1/100 wavelength) vertical, but I am interested to know by how m= uch.

So, if you copy my WSPR signal later today at a lower level than = usual, you know the reason.

I expect to set up after lunch and= start TXing around 1400gmt.

WSPR reports on the earth pr= obe antenna will be MUCH appreciated.

73s
Roger G3XBM
--047d7b6da40c32986f04d29d5b0a--