Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 82B6038000097; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:58:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U0DYN-0000Y1-FS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:56:55 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U0DYN-0000Xs-1I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:56:55 +0000 Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U0DYK-0008PS-Iq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:56:53 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id j8so383513qah.14 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:56:31 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FNJrfscfBu+2H/bYxIhIV6F0VtmEIw8goA7NHe3/ptU=; b=iKbWb1u8pjJK0aibQbCnYqqu8DMbvBu3dI9F0g5Gy2E6YPLVUSu9tO62nd1wDEdAvt 8xbzSqnwft7pYgJu6F/lWKi6W4tZqUIim8DJATWtASWRqFHOS0DE4WuZkicd0wtSTNQO zJkW4w4haVItIJJy9o05lHzQhXighRPyjowWcP6KZy6LpAycVFvPfVKfIfHDlrqkGi8g 9/XogagdfBrhutZrIttSbeLS6m1rq9niRnpv+VCejUkxf6VuiQ/HJAFVuvuJtHpo8a60 3iY67P54ZjNBAHf1We3EZpBauRI3uS6l2j0gsEb2nSodMZpH/CVU63jhtf5y08Nn6eiH PjOA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.48.43 with SMTP id i11mr1851101qen.3.1359474991114; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:56:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.156.18 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:56:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:56:30 +0000 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Getting reports on my QRPp (~30uW ERP) 137.5kHz WSPR2 signal from G8HUH at *250km *today*,* my best WSPR LF DX so far, Signal levels are -23 to -31dB S/N, a result in line with my increase in ERP (6dB) and the better decode sensitivity of WSPR2 compared with QRSS3 (5dB?). G4FEV at 56.7km reports a much stronger signal, strong enough for a CW QSO. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.216.48 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 3f8d74a8c70dd416d0a3a1dbcb9bb89f Subject: LF: 137.5kHz WSPR2 success with the earth-electrode antenna and ~30uW ERP Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d89c2ed299b04d46f6f98 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-dk02.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4065107f1a81d78 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --047d7b6d89c2ed299b04d46f6f98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Getting reports on my QRPp (~30uW ERP) 137.5kHz WSPR2 signal from G8HUH at *250km *today*,* my best WSPR LF DX so far, Signal levels are -23 to -31dB S/N, a result in line with my increase in ERP (6dB) and the better decode sensitivity of WSPR2 compared with QRSS3 (5dB?). G4FEV at 56.7km reports a much stronger signal, strong enough for a CW QSO. The WSPR2 signal will be left running at around 20% until Wednesday morning, * **Any further spots would be much appreciated*. * * 73s Roger G3XBM -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM --047d7b6d89c2ed299b04d46f6f98 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Getting reports on my QRPp (~30uW ERP) 137.5kHz = WSPR2 signal from G8HUH at 250km today, my best WSPR LF DX so= far,

Signal levels are -23 to -31dB S/N, a result in line with my i= ncrease in ERP (6dB) and the better decode sensitivity of WSPR2 compared wi= th QRSS3 (5dB?). G4FEV at 56.7km reports a much stronger signal, strong eno= ugh for a CW QSO.

The WSPR2 signal will be left running at around 20% until Wednesd= ay morning,

Any further spots would be much apprec= iated.

73s
Roger G3XBM
--047d7b6d89c2ed299b04d46f6f98--