Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5C47E38000163; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:16:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TwGSv-0002Dl-VK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:14:57 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TwGSv-0002Dc-F5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:14:57 +0000 Received: from blu0-omc1-s5.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TwGSt-0002Pp-LS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:14:56 +0000 Received: from BLU402-EAS144 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s5.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:14:33 -0800 X-EIP: [fMAgRE7EIjeO3zZs4dwEYeduQve889+G] X-Originating-Email: [hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com] Message-ID: References: <000e01cdf415$a672bbc0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: Laurence KL1 X MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <000e01cdf415$a672bbc0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:14:35 -0700 To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" CC: rsgb X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jan 2013 18:14:33.0629 (UTC) FILETIME=[AABA44D0:01CDF5A7] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Look forward to seeing your signal in KL7 someday Mal - hasnt happened yet sadly. To date Ive never seen LF/MF signals from Eu that wouldnt require a little more than ear/brain decode processing Laurence in VE5 [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hellozerohellozero[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 8556389a5ea14fbbf9b9d801ab70c592 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-97CED40D-45CE-471F-A87A-5E3CD561BC47" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: LF: LF es MF X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408450f991642871 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --Apple-Mail-97CED40D-45CE-471F-A87A-5E3CD561BC47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Look forward to seeing your signal in KL7 someday Mal - hasnt happened yet s= adly. To date Ive never seen LF/MF signals from Eu that wouldnt require a little m= ore than ear/brain decode processing=20 Laurence in VE5 On Jan 16, 2013, at 11:19 AM, "mal hamilton" wrote: > LF es MF > Is there anyone able to QSO these days on either CW or QRSS on the 136 or 4= 72 Khz bands, or where appropriate xband. > I am not interested in BEACON 24/7 hoping for a HIT somewhere in the world= .even though at this time of year propagation is optimum. > I would prefer to go back to the past where QSO mode was the normal proced= ure and not QSL via internet. > At present I would expect to be able to QSO with KL7 es YV if they were su= itably equipped to Transmit on QRSS 30 - 60 > I do not think anyone from the UK or EU has made a QSO on LF/MF in recent= years across to North America or Russia on either CW or QRSS > =20 > De G3KEV > =20 > =20 > =20 --Apple-Mail-97CED40D-45CE-471F-A87A-5E3CD561BC47 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Look forward to seeing your signal in KL7 someday Mal - hasnt happened yet sadly.

 To date Ive never seen LF/MF signals from Eu that wouldnt require a little more than ear/brain decode processing 

Laurence in VE5

On Jan 16, 2013, at 11:19 AM, "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:

LF es MF
Is there anyone able to QSO these days on either CW or QRSS on the 136 or 472 Khz bands, or where appropriate xband.
I am not interested in BEACON 24/7 hoping for a HIT somewhere in the world.even though at this time of year propagation is optimum.
I would prefer to go back to the past where QSO mode was the normal procedure and not QSL via internet.
At present I would expect to be able to QSO with KL7 es YV if they were suitably equipped to Transmit on QRSS 30 - 60
I do not think anyone from the UK or EU  has made a QSO on LF/MF in recent years across to North America or Russia on either CW or QRSS
 
De G3KEV
 
 
 
--Apple-Mail-97CED40D-45CE-471F-A87A-5E3CD561BC47--