Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6A8B538000099; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 06:27:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TuiAp-0004qG-R4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:25:51 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TuiAp-0004q7-Bo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:25:51 +0000 Received: from mail.senselan.ch ([194.153.189.2]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TuiAn-0005Af-8y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:25:50 +0000 Received: (qmail 26613 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2013 11:25:14 -0000 Received: from webmail.senselan.ch (traumwandler@sensemail.ch@194.153.189.10) by mail.senselan.ch with ESMTPA; 14 Jan 2013 11:25:12 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:25:12 +0100 From: traumwandler@sensemail.ch To: In-Reply-To: <9F8CB1AEE09F4B658239326D0F662F09@gmc.net> References: <1528720709.20130114092604@tut.by> <9F8CB1AEE09F4B658239326D0F662F09@gmc.net> Message-ID: <9c494fbe723577af4dd29b67cf93c22a@sensemail.ch> X-Sender: traumwandler@sensemail.ch User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Petr Direct CW Activity is lower than I expected. Especially the UK is disappointing. But so far I had QSO's every evening and I think I've now a dozen or so of DXCC entities in my log, still without Malta, Norway and Denmark, and of course Monaco. Propagation is changing very much not only from day to day, there is also a heavy and long QSB in this band. Sometimes stations are coming out of nowhere and popping up with 599, just to disappear a couple of minutes later. Here in the middle of Europe, surrounded by mountains and on rocky soil, the band is dead during the day. Ground wave propagation is far away from 136 kHz and goes no further than 100 or 200km. On the shore and in higher latitudes, it is probably different. But at night signals are good and the noise level depends on the china appliances my neighbor is using. Sometimes I'm working QSX 3.5 MHz and I had already very nice cross QSO’s with D, F and HB, also with ON on 500 kHz. Some stations are quite strong here and I hear them every night, like Mal, G3KEV, peaking up to 599. But there are a lot of QRP stations around with only a couple of Watts and modest antennas; they have faint signals buried in the noise. I think these stations are far away from the allowed EIRP. Here I’m compensating my bad antenna built on sand stone (100 Ohm loss, 300mOhm radiation res.) with 500 Watts. So I come probably close to the allowed 5W EIRP. I'm not interested in WSPR or any beacon mode. Why should I? I know that my CW signal covers whole Europe under good condx and I like to make CW contacts. 73 de Toni, HB9ASB, JN36nu [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [194.153.189.2 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 290c8768709872f914a4ca71ad6bfe49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: LF: Listened on 472 kHz X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad250f3eb994396 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Petr Direct CW Activity is lower than I expected. Especially the UK is disappointing. But so far I had QSO's every evening and I think I've now a dozen or so of DXCC entities in my log, still without Malta, Norway and Denmark, and of course Monaco. Propagation is changing very much not only from day to day, there is also a heavy and long QSB in this band. Sometimes stations are coming out of nowhere and popping up with 599, just to disappear a couple of minutes later. Here in the middle of Europe, surrounded by mountains and on rocky soil, the band is dead during the day. Ground wave propagation is far away from 136 kHz and goes no further than 100 or 200km. On the shore and in higher latitudes, it is probably different. But at night signals are good and the noise level depends on the china appliances my neighbor is using. Sometimes I'm working QSX 3.5 MHz and I had already very nice cross QSO’s with D, F and HB, also with ON on 500 kHz. Some stations are quite strong here and I hear them every night, like Mal, G3KEV, peaking up to 599. But there are a lot of QRP stations around with only a couple of Watts and modest antennas; they have faint signals buried in the noise. I think these stations are far away from the allowed EIRP. Here I’m compensating my bad antenna built on sand stone (100 Ohm loss, 300mOhm radiation res.) with 500 Watts. So I come probably close to the allowed 5W EIRP. I'm not interested in WSPR or any beacon mode. Why should I? I know that my CW signal covers whole Europe under good condx and I like to make CW contacts. 73 de Toni, HB9ASB, JN36nu Am 14.01.2013 09:28, schrieb Petr Maly: > Hello all, > > I can reasonably listen to LF/MF only in my /P QTH. After long long > time I could spend almost the whole Saturday by listening on 472 kHz. > The only station heard was DL2HRE, see the screenshot. I haven't > heard > any one else, and no QSO. I believe the conditions would allow the > standard two-way CW QSOs easily. > Is the current traffic on 472 kHz really that low? Are you all on > WSPR? Is the activity now splitted amongst 136, 472 and 505 kHz? > Should I listen after sunset instead? Is the number of countries with > 472 kHz permitted for all still low? > > 73, Petr, OK1FIG