Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 32EBE380000B7; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:23:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tt368-0007qk-0Z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:22:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tt367-0007qa-1p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:22:07 +0000 Received: from nm4-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.108.93]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tt365-0008I5-18 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:22:05 +0000 Received: from [212.82.108.231] by nm4.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2013 21:21:44 -0000 Received: from [77.238.189.18] by tm4.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2013 21:21:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp818.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2013 21:21:44 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1357766504; bh=DJT8UTlYxygdTHWMvmtfzSsmrF7M5GWGd2QxU6GAhjk=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=tN55aGKl9OADHR1PxBQr410+xOhDjaXWVsGzFT8wRe0kQPJBKgZC6VWldzTq1ealf/lFDYW05tundUu1nNIQ2JBctAqQgqD90i3PXiliuEOEL+NTO+iL9qe4mcHmig/PgEsYut1/XEOVwvKAD7NC45cmYw0tissWvaKhghzo22E= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 176681.65182.bm@smtp818.mail.ird.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: zgoSHxIVM1mGLeeqNnng3Mzs_3vNyE8Y4ibPL.nHlacHxdJ 9_taAgjd6znl8e0o5qPOytWNxirysrCl31U21uW813Eg_WlO6olNJ.OBs2cZ bxXNXoKTBvBWT9FL2yigeAVIY1XyWXd1KA_XYE_m7pzVdVCHukj1Nzqiloog L4fqpxUGoK6Vx5QE6HOOB_EKi_9rGtDIpPksE5nPiI7nrJBpk6UBq3bt7yrT H4hp1AEupeyDQBcpSyb879s2WkJ4_NYBJHRcxdewcC.sAoVEdF_WpGvqjXIu QLn5knydV8Y_1ayqkjWKi_vVLKi684PVR6ePQZWfmRgOi2AtY48YzU5zy7__ XXqUurtTbZHQxW9wp4w.4oX.Linjj7Urlx0hcExieuVGGrqAYQdRlw6bvrNs vNE2oF_73cPQVS4NBaX8rMrxq5i8N5s7C47CN0Yo0o4vqhNiV.C_pS9HZV27 .czFi95s- X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- Received: from gnat (alan.melia@81.157.0.154 with login) by smtp818.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 09 Jan 2013 21:21:43 +0000 UTC Message-ID: <6DDE45A2DAD5431F88116F9E053ACE5E@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <1357741041.84828.YahooMailNeo@web133205.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <50ED8257.8010001@psk31.plus.com> <1357747491.77414.YahooMailNeo@web133206.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 17:39:15 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130109-0, 09/01/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Pete that is the first report of any problems with the Yahoo group, as it is set up virtually the same way as the softrock group I am keen to know what the difference is. There are not a lot of options available, the way it deals with attachments is possibly the most "obvious" and that was set up to the users choice. [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.108.93 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: f9f85a03ab18710b130c40acc03380f0 Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B3_01CDEE90.3E6C2AF0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_40_50,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mi01.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b8950eddfeb67da X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00B3_01CDEE90.3E6C2AF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Pete that is the first report of any problems with the Yahoo group, = as it is set up virtually the same way as the softrock group I am keen = to know what the difference is. There are not a lot of options = available, the way it deals with attachments is possibly the most = "obvious" and that was set up to the users choice. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message -----=20 From: M0FMT=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 4:04 PM Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo? Thanks Eddie I was initially in favour of Yahoo but it seems very "clunky" now and = the repository not so good as I had hoped. At the time I was modelling = it on the Softrock Yahoo group that works very well. However in attempt = to limit the number of groups here I pulled out but went back the other = day for a peek and what did I find my Blacksheep posting. I am not = complaining its just I wondered why or if there had been a combining or = something. Your comments have answered my question and thanks for the advice. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX From: g3zjo To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, 9 January 2013, 14:44 Subject: Re: LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo? Good point Pete I tend to post here for sked and comment messages that could be = considered clutter on the Yahoo archive, and Yahoo for monumental = announcements and technical advances of benefit for mankind to be saved = for ever, (well maybe not). However stuff does get replied to on here and also echoed by the = replying station on Yahoo, so what you didn't intend to go to Yahoo = appears there. Also it can happen that a personal reply to someone about = a Blacksheep post can gather some moss and get posted on both = reflectors. Care needed. 73 Eddie On 09/01/2013 14:17, M0FMT wrote:=20 Hi all You have heard the expression "Is there an echo in here?". But = there seems to be one on the Yahoo LF group.... why? 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO91UX ------=_NextPart_000_00B3_01CDEE90.3E6C2AF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Pete that is the first report of any = problems=20 with the Yahoo group, as it is set up virtually the same way as the = softrock=20 group I am keen to know what the difference is. There are not a lot of = options=20 available, the way it deals with attachments is possibly the most = "obvious" and=20 that was set up to the users choice.
 
Alan
G3NYK
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 M0FMT
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, = 2013 4:04=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Why are = threads on here=20 echoed on Yahoo?

Thanks Eddie
 
I was initially in=20 favour of Yahoo but it seems very "clunky" now and the repository not so good as I had = hoped. At=20 the time I was modelling it on the Softrock Yahoo group that works very well. However = in=20 attempt to limit the number of groups here I pulled out but went back = the=20 other day for a peek and what did I find my Blacksheep posting. I am = not=20 complaining its just I wondered why or if there had been a combining = or=20 something.
 
Your comments have answered my question and thanks for = the=20 advice.
73 es GL Pete M0FMT = IO91UX
From: g3zjo <g3zjo@psk31.plus.com>
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
Sent: Wednesday, = 9 January=20 2013, 14:44
Subject: Re:=20 LF: Why are threads on here echoed on Yahoo?

Good point Pete

I tend to post here for sked and comment messages that could be = considered clutter=20 on the Yahoo archive, and Yahoo for monumental announcements and = technical=20 advances of benefit for mankind to be saved for ever, (well maybe=20 not).

However stuff does get replied to on here and also = echoed by=20 the replying station on Yahoo, so what you didn't intend to go to = Yahoo=20 appears there. Also it can happen that a personal reply to someone = about a=20 Blacksheep post can gather some moss and  get posted on both=20 reflectors.

Care needed.

73 Eddie


On = 09/01/2013=20 14:17, M0FMT wrote:=20
Hi all
 
You have heard the expression "Is there an echo in = here?". But=20 there seems to be one on the Yahoo LF group.... = why?

73 es GL Pete = M0FMT IO91UX



&n= bsp; ------=_NextPart_000_00B3_01CDEE90.3E6C2AF0--