Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 11B0938000081; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:08:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U0fJs-00018e-JJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:35:48 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U0fJs-00018V-5k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:35:48 +0000 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U0fJp-0004BM-RT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:35:47 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAM+JCVECZMOO/2dsb2JhbAANOL8lgxEBAQEBAzhRCwkPCSUPAkYTCAEBiBmuMZNBjWODKQOWDYEckiY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,569,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="398519586" Received: from host-2-100-195-142.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.195.142]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2013 21:35:24 +0000 Message-ID: <5109921A.10101@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:35:22 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130130-0, 30/01/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Roger I did take a look for you last night but QRM levels here, interference like heavy theater curtains, means 136KHz is a no go area for me unless whoever it is stops doing what ever it is. I am also doing it the difficult way still, running my 200uW TX on WSPR and QRSS on 475KHz producing regular spots from the UK, DL, PA and F. However confirming my previous tests the QRSS3 may as well not be there. Not one report received even from a UK station. This is with the QRSS between WSPR transmissions in the WSPR window. If the mode was the slightest bit comparable then surely it would produce a comment even if those seeing the signal cannot resolve a call sign or the unique identification Morse symbol. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: Re: LF: 137.5kHz WSPR2 tonight Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618a510999df61cb X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Roger I did take a look for you last night but QRM levels here, interference like heavy theater curtains, means 136KHz is a no go area for me unless whoever it is stops doing what ever it is. I am also doing it the difficult way still, running my 200uW TX on WSPR and QRSS on 475KHz producing regular spots from the UK, DL, PA and F. However confirming my previous tests the QRSS3 may as well not be there. Not one report received even from a UK station. This is with the QRSS between WSPR transmissions in the WSPR window. If the mode was the slightest bit comparable then surely it would produce a comment even if those seeing the signal cannot resolve a call sign or the unique identification Morse symbol. I will now duck whilst it is mathematically proven that all who are decoding the WSPR are copying the QRSS3 just fine.:-) Eddie On 30/01/2013 17:08, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > My LF WSPR2 tests using the earth-electrode antenna and 30uW ERP max > continue this evening. With 2 unique reports yesterday (G8HUH 250km > and M0GXM 18km, both multiple times), I'm hopeful that others will > copy me this evening. > > Please take a look for me if you get a chance. All spots really > appreciated. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > -- > -- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ > http://qss2.blogspot.com/ > http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM >