Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C35ED3800008D; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:08:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TyTgS-0004Wu-Si for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:46:04 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TyTgS-0004Wl-GR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:46:04 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TyTgQ-0007TY-Bz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:46:03 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r0OKjfmg029463 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:45:41 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r0OKjfXO025612 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:45:41 +0100 Message-ID: <51019D70.8010504@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:45:36 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5100151E.7000800@psk31.plus.com> <8fef6baf61d2994da2d687b00a6e178d@sensemail.ch> <14CD98C1458C4C44B989B7614A6EB099@gmc.net> In-Reply-To: <14CD98C1458C4C44B989B7614A6EB099@gmc.net> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Petr, Am 24.01.2013 12:29, schrieb Petr Maly: > Where should I listen for normal CW, CW is actually done between 472...473.5 kHz, these days. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: Saturday Night Fever Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cc5101a2e92df7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Petr, Am 24.01.2013 12:29, schrieb Petr Maly: > Where should I listen for normal CW, CW is actually done between 472...473.5 kHz, these days. > and where for QRSS/DFCW? QRSS/DFCW-10 is done arround 476.17 kHz. There are several grabbers showing this section of the band, e.g. http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_MF_Grabber.html or http://www.qsl.net/g6avk/ or http://www.qsl.net/g0mqw/ Maybe i will be QRV this saturday. Actually it is a good idea :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Tnx, 73, Petr, OK1FIG > >