Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5D880380000A8; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:10:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TyTba-0004NS-Op for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:41:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TyTba-0004NJ-Bq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:41:02 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TyTbY-0007RV-Ld for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:41:01 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r0OKecwT027859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:40:39 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r0OKecFK025521 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:40:38 +0100 Message-ID: <51019C41.2050205@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:40:33 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5100BFB2.9000009@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5100BFB2.9000009@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Mark, Am 24.01.2013 05:59, schrieb Mark Ku7z: > > I see the Japan stations being reported on the WSPRnet Database at 00, > 20 and 40 minutes. They are running WSPR-2 then? Yes, they do. In the current situation, WSPR-15 stations are not mentioned on the activity page. Furthermore they are not shown on the map, as long as they made the first decode.... Joe mentioned that he will soon change this situation, i.e. he wants to make the WSPR-15 stations visible too. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: Re: LF: Japan stations on WSPR 2 or 15 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cb5101a3516eff X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Mark, Am 24.01.2013 05:59, schrieb Mark Ku7z: > > I see the Japan stations being reported on the WSPRnet Database at 00, > 20 and 40 minutes. They are running WSPR-2 then? Yes, they do. In the current situation, WSPR-15 stations are not mentioned on the activity page. Furthermore they are not shown on the map, as long as they made the first decode.... Joe mentioned that he will soon change this situation, i.e. he wants to make the WSPR-15 stations visible too. > Just want to make sure so I have the right format selected later > tonight after sunrise at DK7FC. We can give it another try this night. However i think that we would rather need a "WSPR-60" mode to make that distance. Actually we both should start with DFCW-180 or so. That path is not an easy one! But time will come :-) 73, TNX and GL! Stefan/DK7FC > I have been copying Japan NAVTEX stations off and on the last couple > of weeks on 518 kHz and thought I would aim the good loop and radio > that way later. > > Mark, Ku7z >