Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 806C638000087; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:50:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TxMQs-0006I4-BH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:49:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TxMQr-0006Hv-Uv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:49:21 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TxMQq-000456-DJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:49:20 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r0LImxxx030985 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:48:59 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r0LImxq4007903; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:48:59 +0100 Message-ID: <50FD8D96.80203@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:48:54 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: Bob Raide References: <50FD8A44.5010705@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <50FD8A44.5010705@gmx.de> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Hartmut, That's a very good result, congrats! What do you think, which QRSS mode is about as sensitive as WSPR-15, from your subjective impression? I would think it must be something arround DFCW-30. But we have to go on with further tests. At least it is very promising! [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: WE2XEB WSPR15 decodes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408f50fd8def00ca X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Hartmut, That's a very good result, congrats! What do you think, which QRSS mode is about as sensitive as WSPR-15, from your subjective impression? I would think it must be something arround DFCW-30. But we have to go on with further tests. At least it is very promising! I've been in contact with Bob/WE2XEB about the tonites TX plan. He will use the other 15 minute slots (15...30 and 45...60). 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 21.01.2013 19:34, schrieb Hartmut Wolff: > Last night I received my first Transatlantic WSPR15 decodes on 136kHz: > > 2013-01-21 02:15 WE2XEB 0.137621 -31 0 FN12lq > 2013-01-21 03:00 WE2XEB 0.137621 -32 0 FN12lq > 2013-01-21 03:15 WE2XEB 0.137621 -34 0 FN12lq > 2013-01-21 03:45 WE2XEB 0.137621 -36 0 FN12lq >