Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 69CBF380000CF; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:29:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TxILv-0005A0-Ax for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:27:59 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TxILu-00059r-Q7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:27:58 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TxILs-0003Ci-EH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:27:57 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r0LERZnM020628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:27:35 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r0LERYud000314 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:27:34 +0100 Message-ID: <50FD5052.7010000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 15:27:30 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Joe, Thanks for the report. Yes, i should have started to TX before the shock ice came in the afternoon. It would have been interesting to see if transmitting helps to prevent that the isolators are covered with ice. And if not, it would have been interesting to see how the breakdown happens :-) At least the PA system seems to be quite robust. A class E PA would have been blown up! [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 3dad7246509e3b317974c9d84e795ac1 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR15 LF DX Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060306040907040808020809" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600a50fd50bf2e2c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060306040907040808020809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Joe, Thanks for the report. Yes, i should have started to TX before the shock ice came in the afternoon. It would have been interesting to see if transmitting helps to prevent that the isolators are covered with ice. And if not, it would have been interesting to see how the breakdown happens :-) At least the PA system seems to be quite robust. A class E PA would have been blown up! I will make some photos soon... 73, Stefan Am 21.01.2013 11:11, schrieb Joe DF2JP: > > Hi Stefan, LF > > The rest of this morning: > > 0745 -28 -0.2 0.137614 0 G8HUH IO81 17 > > 0800 -22 1.1 0.137606 0 DK7FC JN49 30 > > 0815 -26 -0.6 0.137615 0 G8HUH IO81 17 > > 0845 -32 -0.2 0.137614 0 G8HUH IO81 17 > > Stefan, I think you need more power to prevent ice layer on your > antenna :o) > > Your signal were 25 -30 dB down comparing the night before. > > 73 Joe > --------------060306040907040808020809 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Joe,

Thanks for the report.

Yes, i should have started to TX before the shock ice came in the afternoon. It would have been interesting to see if transmitting helps to prevent that the isolators are covered with ice. And if not, it would have been interesting to see how the breakdown happens :-)
At least the PA system seems to be quite robust. A class E PA would have been blown up!

I will make some photos soon...

73, Stefan


Am 21.01.2013 11:11, schrieb Joe DF2JP:

Hi Stefan, LF

 

The rest of this morning:

 

0745 -28 -0.2 0.137614 0 G8HUH IO81 17

0800 -22 1.1 0.137606 0 DK7FC JN49 30

0815 -26 -0.6 0.137615 0 G8HUH IO81 17

0845 -32 -0.2 0.137614 0 G8HUH IO81 17

 

Stefan, I think you need more power to prevent ice layer on your antenna :o)

Your signal were 25 -30 dB down comparing the night before.

 

73 Joe

 

 

--------------060306040907040808020809--