Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4077938000081; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 19:01:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TuXTM-0002zJ-OL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TuXTM-0002zA-Bx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:16 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TuXTK-00034A-Ko for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:15 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0E00Dt4022546 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 01:00:14 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r0E00D35029138 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 01:00:13 +0100 Message-ID: <50F34A88.7020606@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 01:00:08 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001801cdf1d9$aedbf3a0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <50F33CEE.1040204@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50F3407B.7020505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Joe, Are you using the known antenna? What is the TX pwr?, if this is a valid question :-) 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: e09cca6d8e44a91eadbdfb3e1b8aec09 Subject: Re: LF: 504.1 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d750f34ac32526 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Joe, Are you using the known antenna? What is the TX pwr?, if this is a valid question :-) 73, Stefan Am 14.01.2013 00:54, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > Dear Group, > > It seems it will be some time before Canadian amateurs will have > access to 472-479 kHz. In the mean time, VX9MRC is now QRV with > 10 WPM CW and a 10 second carrier on 504.1 kHz. Reports > will be greatly appreciated! > > Last night, WD2XSH/7 on 476 kHz was quite readable here, across > the continent, but nothing was heard across the pond. > > 73 > Joe VO1NA > > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012.php >