Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 544CF38000207; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:20:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TsHXI-00032e-NV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:35:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TsHXH-00032V-VI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:34:59 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TsHXG-0006KG-9r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 18:34:58 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r07IYvfm001197 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 19:34:57 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r07IYvvC027765 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 19:34:57 +0100 Message-ID: <50EB154C.8050005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 19:34:52 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <52591013-FAE4-489B-8137-61A91BF26751@gmail.com> <50EAFE96.6000400@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Roger, Congrats to the interesting results. I bet many of us have thought that the signals will be significantly lower when then system runs on batteries. However keep in mind the QSB and changing propagation which may influence your results. Best may be to do the tests in daytime and in a range below 200 km or so. The results remember me on my full size dipole experiments in July last year. Everybody expected the the signals must be down in the noise but later i had several QSOs in normal CW, with a /p equipment... [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 5f132ffce194fb93f2267a462d849f2b Subject: Re: LF: More earth electrodes tests at 472kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604950eb201b0694 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Roger, Congrats to the interesting results. I bet many of us have thought that the signals will be significantly lower when then system runs on batteries. However keep in mind the QSB and changing propagation which may influence your results. Best may be to do the tests in daytime and in a range below 200 km or so. The results remember me on my full size dipole experiments in July last year. Everybody expected the the signals must be down in the noise but later i had several QSOs in normal CW, with a /p equipment... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 07.01.2013 18:36, schrieb Roger Lapthorn: > Just fed everything from a 12V battery (no mains grounds) and result unchanged. It STILL works. > > Now QRT until late this evening as my Internet signal in the rear study where set up temporarily is too weak to reliably sync time without all the doors open! After about 10.30 I'll try again when we go to bed and leave all internal doors open, HI. > > Fascinating results. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > On 7 Jan 2013, at 16:57, g3zjo wrote: > > >> Yes still a good signal. >> >> I take it there is no Earth connection via the TX chassis - PSU route either. >> >> You know I am pretty sure that round here I would get dreadful hum from 2 earth stakes. >> When I was the other side of town and much younger I melted the innards of my AVO Multiminor measuring between two earths. Also I ran a 6 Volt fan and charged batteries via a diode between Neutral and an earth spike. The fan would go so fast on a Sunday morning (electric cookers) that it would take off. >> >> Eddie >> >> >> >> On 07/01/2013 16:36, Roger Lapthorn wrote: >> >>> Since 1608gmt I have been WSPRing with an even shorter earth electrode "antenna" ( baseline about 15m) with BOTH ends connected to ground rods in the soil. Max connecting wire height still 1.5m. Yesterday I used the house pipes as one ground. >>> >>> Initial tests suggest reports are almost identical, suggesting the true " loop in the ground" hypothesis rather than propagation aided in any way by pipes. This is NOT the case at VLF. >>> >>> Most fascinating that this tiny "non antenna" works at all. >>> >>> 73s >>> Roger G3XBM >>> >> >