Message-ID: <50E6E2AF.1040301@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:09:51 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <0A4D88A68FCB4F22A2BC40825788A6AA@AGB> <1357150913.48886.YahooMailNeo@web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <63C5AFAA6F8C41A7936F2069D38FAC01@AGB> <81FED2F455C94E45B3BE41353A6D53BC@W1KW> <52B2628757094925BA8206A2C0D9640B@AGB> <1357173044.69099.YahooMailNeo@web133203.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <48BBF8CC892E4164B0E96E856BB44972@gnat> <1357243322.31464.YahooMailNeo@web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1357243322.31464.YahooMailNeo@web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: LF: 477   A local  SSB  chat  band  ?
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------000001030408020106000904"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000001030408020106000904
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id r04E9uwh015049


Am 03.01.2013 21:02, schrieb M0FMT:
> [...]
> If I was the =E2=80=9Cauthority=E2=80=9D I would have only CW and no ot=
her modes on 630m.
Hi Pete,

Really?
Well, i bet for G.. it would be only SSB and Opera ;-)

For me it would be

Exclusive CW (QSO mode) from 472...475
QRSS/DFCW (all slow modes) having 100 Hz of space
then WSPR and Opera, 200 Hz each (closer together than now)
a small range for CW beacons (but _not_ in the QSO part of the band),=20
maybe 500 Hz BW
On the upper 2.5 kHz (476.5...479) i would allow to play arround with=20
what ever (including SSB)

So everone can do what he/she wants. 3 kHz of space for CW QSOs is=20
really enough (despite the NDBs and their sidebands), don't you think?=20
Have you ever seen/heared a moment of CW activity which covered more=20
than 3 kHz (say > 8 QSOs) to the same time??

A CW QSO is not disturbed at all by QRSS/WSPR/Opera activity which is=20
outside the filter BW or say a few kHz distant. Otherwise the NDBs would=20
cause interference as well. So what is the problem?

We can all play together on the band without stress i think.

73, Stefan/DK7FC
>

--------------000001030408020106000904
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id r04E9uwh015049

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUTF-8" http-equiv=3D"Content-Type=
">
</head>
<body bgcolor=3D"#ffffff" text=3D"#000000">
<br>
Am 03.01.2013 21:02, schrieb M0FMT:
<blockquote
 cite=3D"mid:1357243322.31464.YahooMailNeo@web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com"
 type=3D"cite">
  <div
 style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font=
-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
  <div><span><font face=3D"Times New Roman"></font></span></div>
[...]<span><span
 style=3D"color: black; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&q=
uot;;" lang=3D"EN-US"></span><o:p></o:p></span>
  <div><font face=3D"Times New Roman"></font></div>
  <div><span style=3D"color: black; font-family: &quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;=
sans-serif&quot;;"
 lang=3D"EN-US">If I was the =E2=80=9Cauthority=E2=80=9D I would have onl=
y CW and no
other modes on 630m. </span></div>
  </div>
</blockquote>
Hi Pete, <br>
<br>
Really? <br>
Well, i bet for G.. it would be only SSB and Opera ;-)<br>
<br>
For me it would be <br>
<br>
Exclusive CW (QSO mode) from 472...475<br>
QRSS/DFCW (all slow modes) having 100 Hz of space<br>
then WSPR and Opera, 200 Hz each (closer together than now)<br>
a small range for CW beacons (but <u>not</u> in the QSO part of the
band), maybe 500 Hz BW<br>
On the upper 2.5 kHz (476.5...479) i would allow to play arround with
what ever (including SSB)<br>
<br>
So everone can do what he/she wants. 3 kHz of space for CW QSOs is
really enough (despite the NDBs and their sidebands), don't you think?
Have you ever seen/heared a moment of CW activity which covered more
than 3 kHz (say &gt; 8 QSOs) to the same time?? <br>
<br>
A CW QSO is not disturbed at all by QRSS/WSPR/Opera activity which is
outside the filter BW or say a few kHz distant. Otherwise the NDBs
would cause interference as well. So what is the problem?<br>
<br>
We can all play together on the band without stress i think.<br>
<br>
73, Stefan/DK7FC
<blockquote
 cite=3D"mid:1357243322.31464.YahooMailNeo@web133204.mail.ir2.yahoo.com"
 type=3D"cite">
  <div
 style=3D"color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font=
-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
  <div>
  <blockquote
 style=3D"border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); padding-left: 5px; mar=
gin-top: 5px; margin-left: 5px;">
    <div
 style=3D"font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"> </d=
iv>
  </blockquote>
  </div>
  </div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------000001030408020106000904--